Skip Navigation

∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]
∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name] @ Edie @lemmy.ml
Posts
2
Comments
304
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Tor is distributed under the "3-clause BSD" license

    The reason gitlab says it is, is because the LICENSE file contains all licenses for the codebase, including stuff like geoip which is destributed under CC BY-SA 4.0

    This file contains the license for Tor,

    It also lists the licenses for other components used by Tor.

  • I tried giving you an out on the bolding thing by restating it differently. I made the mistake of seeing "IMF" and "NATO" in Cowbees and locking on to the second bullet point where "IMF" and "NATO" also is, but upon closer inspection realized that it was in fact the third one. If you made a similar mistake you could just have said that.

  • "It is in the Left's interest for these organizations to be demolished" is bolded. That is the line Cowbee is referring to, "these organizations" are "organizations such as NATO, the IMF, and the World Bank" as written in the previous bullet point.

  • The rhetoric and goal of Hexbar are clear based on their announcement: to “dismantle western propaganda” and "demolish organizations such as NATO” shows that Hexbar has no intention of "respecting the rules of the community instance in which they are posting/commenting.” It’s to push their beliefs and ideology.

    This is quoting the anti-imperialist parts, not the part where they tell them not to brigade or other such things, and saying that those mean hexbear has no intention of respecting the rules!

    And if they really had a problem with this, then people that did the same on their instance would not be as Cowbee has pointed out:

    Lemmy.world does not care about “idelogical warfare” itself as bad, as there are constant drama farms and prominent users and comms on Lemmy.world that directly state their intent is to push anti-communist views, yet these users are protected, made moderators, etc. Logically, therefore, it’s the views that matter, not the idea of “protecting against brigading.”

    The problem is the beliefs and ideology (again why are they highlighting the anti-imperialist, i.e. communist, parts?) not the "pushing" part

  • why was there a newspaper to each workplace in which workers could write their complaints and their ideas

    In which more than just airing complaints, something would be done

  • Yes. But... technically it doesn't show up on hexbear because hexbear defederated from .world, and if it wasn't mutual it would show up (as seen with 'grad)

    Edit: It's an pretty much a useless distinction that I'm probably only making cuz I should go to bed.

  • There isn't any. Hexbear has defederated lemmy.world, which is OPs instance, and so this post does not exist for them.

  • Genuine question re Democratic Centralism, what is the alternative? In any kind of org (surely even non-political), you vote on something and then... don't follow the result of the vote?

  • "Vanguard" and "Capillary" are not two different systems, no? The Soviet Union had soviets, a capillary system, with chosen candidates. At least I think so, my knowledge isn't that comprehensive.