∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name] @ Edie @lemmy.ml

AuDHD cat. If you don't know which pronoun to use, go for it/its. Helpful w

---

Read more

Posts

2

Comments

363

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

1. The first link is SEO garbage, that claims to be the official LO site but it is NOT the LibreOffice website
2. The post already said LibreOffice Calc is not an alternative.

Try typing uppercase letters on a mobile device over KDEConnect on Wayland

I did. What am I supposed to notice?

You've redefined the definition (multiple times while saying you stand by the original one, but let's not talk about that). The original one did not include anything about economic pressures, nor diplomatic.

Any diplomacy that extends a country's power and influence is imperialism by your original definition. There wasn't any qualifiers such as pressure.

I'm not sure it was "seeking out." masquenox was talking with hexbear users in the comments removed 23 days ago and probably in the two posts I linked.

And it changed it’s argument from when I last read its comment. Surely that’s not weird.

I presume you are talking about me? I have not changed any arguments in this post, was it something from longer ago I don't remember right now?

They have actually been removed now. After I made my comments.

Which part is not documented?

On the one hand, I think if someone should be banned, offending comments should be removed so the modlog contains documentation. But on the other, it does lead to what you said, where it only appears removed on hexbear and not on other instances. And yeah, if you didn't ban someone for things they did outside of the instance, that wouldn't be a problem. I've also seen the opposite, where content removed by mods/admins a dbzer0 comm removed comments and it was then re-instated on hexbear (and only on hexbear)

No. The comment would have been removed if it did. The 5 comments removed 23 days ago with reason "rule 8" might have gotten them banned, and/or comments in the flippanarchy and anarchism posts are the reason (although, if that is the reason then I think offending comments should have been removed, so it is documented)

No. Banned for "Rule 8"

8. No sectarianism, also when engaging with your fellow users please take the most charitable interpretation and assume good faith.

I think they were banned for comments on a dbzer0 comm yeah.

https://hexbear.net/post/4334210/5846827

You made a comment there a year ago, and were subsequently site banned and therefore also banned from all comma you had interacted in.

If you want to read theory

I skimmed What is to be done and Socialism: Utopian and Scientific and it was hard to understand NERD shit.

No.

We all know it's DPRK. "Dynasty" is 99% of the time the DPRK.

It's even more incomprehensible. Good job.

The far right bend needs to be going the opposite direction, towards more cis.

Also why are tankies more fascist?

I guess the 2 dimensionality of the image makes it hard to see.

PDF files sounds somewhat like pedophiles. I don't know why verdi didn't just write out pedophile.