With defederation isn't the fediverse no different from just separate bb forums we used to have that Reddir eventually killed them all off? Fediverse with too much defederation is just moving backwards and brings back the problems of the past.
Isn't that just... Bethesda improving?
I mean while he could physically fly away very easily it's unlikely he would risk losing access to his properties and accounts in the US.
Yep, got 4 GB of history myself. When my wife updated her phone we made a mistake and had to transfer Signal twice, I didn't even notice that the first transfer wiped her whole history. What a stupid feature it's like the Signal devs treat us like children. Unfortunately I haven't found a replacement that is as popular and I'm happy with yet.
Which we all know is going to happen anyway.
Yeah 30 to 60 is a big difference. Past 60 things definitely start looking real samey though.
Been playing Divinity Original Sin 2, trying to finally finish my first campaign with a friend committing genocide against the magisters before BG3 releases.
Fuck yeah love to hear it.
Yeah but hopefully they are refering to the common stuff that happened to everyone like cars flying around and killing you randomly in Fallout 4.
How can you view the list of defederated instances?
Edit: Nevermind found it, it's at the bottom of the page click Instances and then scroll to Blocked Instances.
Most people are probably just doing something completely unrelated. Remember 99% of people aren't spending a ton of time online.
I won't lie I only preordered because I wanted the 5 day early play. My excuse though is that I literally have not preordered a game since we still needed to get them from Gamestop and I've been waiting for Starfield for like 5 years now.
The sad thing is there's a right way to do everything they want but this ain't it. Spez is litterally digging a hole using the bricks he could be building with.
Probably 95% of that is overlapping since one person being subbed to 20 participating subs is counted 20 times, and since some default and massive subs are participating there must be a ton of overlap.
How can we determine malicious intent?
If a bunch of people go to have a discussion and one person says "Hey we should mess with them" is the whole group considered malicious?
On the flip side if a bunch of people go and comment maliciously but it's never explicit is it fair to just assign malicious intent to them?
Nah Steve isn't smart enough for that.
So wait if I post a link on here and a bunch of people go there and comment wouldn't that be brigading? So basically this entire platform can be considered as designed to brigade other websites?
But followers that don't want to see it could also block those people no?