well the publishing associations should be catching wind of this and it's already going through court so I guess we'll find out.

But if I had to guess I'd say the bourgeois court system which is loaded with Trump's picks right at the top is actually not going to let the billionaire donor go to jail

Oh great, let's just give Farage and co. a big old back door to spy on us when he inevitably stumbles into power. Can't see that being abused in any way.

Oh yeah the hosted DeepSeek has that

Wow Starmer's really fucking it.

oh interesting, but they did seed some. Distributors! Zuck go straight to yar-har jail

The very stretched use of the word "voluntary" here also leads one to inspect the meaning of "departure".

Any minute now a labour centrist type will be along to tell us that criticising Mandelson for his friendship with Epstein and all that implies is not pragmatic and is in fact unreasonable purity politics.

we can make it more cursed: sudo $(curl http://sonic.exe.info/sonic.sh) | sh

I think there's a balance, in that if everybody suppressed that speech and refused to take that risk of criticising then those corrupt and powerful state actors would be unchallenged.

They can then become even more powerful and may continue to encroach into private life and speech. While it may be necessary to defend yourself on the one hand, hiding entirely may also present additional dangers.

I'm very much so on this team. Single digit hours are too early, frankly.

Presumably every other country now ought to update their safety advice as it pertains to the US. Bleak.

Hanlon's razor. It's pretty clear some people can be stupid and malicious simultaneously, or will even feign stupidity to hide malice.

Yeah but I bet he's a 10x ninja

A good way is to find a meetup group with some shared interest. It doesn't really matter what so long as the crowd is good and you know enough to hold a conversation in the subject.