Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CT
Posts
2
Comments
99
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • My understanding was the goal was polluting training data for AI. Not privacy and having their comments skipped. Point is AI won’t have an issue realising it’s not useful/relevant data. Worst case is minor performance issues wasted on parsing the character.

  • Im almost certain it’s trolling with the AI reason as an excuse. It would have very little effect on an AI, which would recognise the character as anomalous and discard it or ignore the comment. The only other person I saw doing it replied with every character replaced with similar nonsense when I stated similar to them. Wouldn’t surprise me if it was their former account as it was a while ago and it was copping bans because of it.

  • Given the discussion surrounding this, anyone who’s into gaming should check out Soma; as it tackles a lot of the questions/scenarios in this thread but with robot host instead of clones. Minor spoiler:

  • Consent is important to you in regard to her behaviour but a dude obviously lying in order to expose himself to a young woman? “What consent, oh and he was probably just drunk or some other excuse”. Where has the video been shared because I can’t track it down?

    Edit: this guy upvoted the following comment further down.

    Pretty much “she was probably shit at her job and made it all up” but I’m sure you’re super concerned about consent and privacy though lol.

  • Read my comment again. I said "the threat of physical escalation".

    ??? I did and my reply was “that’s your definition. The courts dont operate under your definitions” but polite.

    She had to walk in his home to see him naked.

    Source? Even if she did after, the door was open. After he instructed her to “leave it at the door”.

    Public indecency laws don't apply. His home isn't a public space, even if he left the door open.

    Im just going to paste what I already replied to you in another thread

    But, “exposure can be deemed indecent if visible from public areas, such as a street or neighbor’s yard,”

    You do seems to be trying very hard to argue this behaviour is fine and appear to be doing your absolute best not to understand the myriad of information I’ve presented to you as being indicative of this man being a potential sexual offender. Yo yo’ing from “being naked in your house isn’t illegal” to “this doesn’t meet my definition of sexual assault” despite both of those being incorrect contextually and arguably irrelevant.

  • Ok well the legal definition is different, so that is worth factoring in to your own definition. That doesn’t even work for traditional physical assault, as in some jurisdictions you can be charged with assault for threatening it as well.

    If he just really wanted to expose himself to a stranger? Maybe lewd behavior or something? He's in his own home and there's nothing illegal about just being naked in your home

    Just is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that first sentence. As I mentioned in another reply, being naked in your home (which is relevant to public nudity/indecency laws, not sexual harassment or assault laws) can be illegal if viewable from public spaces. Just because he may not be eligible to be charged for public indecency, doesn’t mean he can’t be charged with another offence.

    He's gross and deserves to lose his account, but what else do you think should happen?

    Some form of sexual harassment/assault charge, even if minor, unless he can demonstrate with evidence there’s a reasonable explanation for him being naked when he knows a stranger is approaching his home. Maybe a small fine/community work but most importantly the charge establishes a history of sexual offences if his offending develops into a pattern or escalates in the future.

  • The article uses the term harassment more than assault. Either way rape isn’t the only thing charged as sexual assault and depending on jurisdiction, can encapsulate a variety of offending.

    Sexual assault is a broad term that captures any sexual act or attempt to engage in a sexual act where consent is not obtained or freely and voluntarily given. It represents any behaviour of a sexual nature that makes someone feel uncomfortable, frightened, intimidated, or threatened.

    Also, so what if it wasn’t that form of specific sexual assault? I doubt your implying that anything less than rape should be handwaved away so I’m a bit confused by the whole “that isn’t sexual assault” rhetoric I’ve seen on this post.

  • I think the larger point here is the article has presented someone as being a potential victim of sexual harassment; in which she faces punishment from her employers. Yet people are questioning her actions and making excuses for the bloke. I think that’s worth pointing out, not really a matter of “being correct” imo.

  • “It’s cold outside… your lights are on, your door is open, and you just ordered DoorDash… And within 15 minutes, you’re asleep on the couch naked? Come on now. That is voyeurism,” she said regarding the incident.

    Or maybe, just don’t be a creep that strips (or remains) naked and tries to get a gig worker to see you naked? You’re a woman at work and a strange man, in an area unfamiliar to you, has tried to engineer a situation where you walk into him being naked. Recording was likely a safety instinct as well as expecting people wouldn’t believe her if she decided to report something.

    I don’t think people expecting to work without random men getting naked around them is the problem here.

  • I liked some of her stuff. Pink Friday was a decent debut for that sort of music. That and Annaconda made for an entertaining watch while at the gym however many moons ago. I think Sexy Redd and Megan Thee do it better. All I hear of her lately is her trying to diss the newer wave of artist because she losing relevancy and her cringe “omg Im actually so unhinged” ramblings live. Sounds like this is more of the same, trying to get drama headlines due to declining relevance.

  • Im good, it’s clear you’re not actually interested. Id hate for your real wife and all your deaf friends to laugh at me again for providing examples of said tools while you unironically claim Im “just trying to win an internet argument”.

  • Ye Power Trippin' Bastards @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Tokenboomer goes through my comments and find one accusing them of lying. Bans for "genocide apologies".

    Ye Power Trippin' Bastards @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Moderated for "genocide denial" when not discussing genocide.