It's a two stage solution to today's existing corruption and problems.
- Break everything to expose the rot
- Break it again to make sure it stays broken
This says more about the attendees than the talks.
It wasn't the developers that were at fault.
If it's not clear yet, the USA's government claims they're trying to restrain Israel's genocide and continue to take steps and tip toe to peace, but in the back rooms they enable and encourage the whole of the enterprise.
Good headline 😀
Instead of telling him he's not welcome, tell him how worthless his comments are.
How long before they start to add exceptions to popular social media apps?
Science?? Have you seen the abortion debate? There are vegetables classified as fruit and other horrors on the law books. Science got nothing to do with it.
The city or county will probably have a thing called a website where you can read about all of those things for each candidate.
Wasn't this the plot of some recent show or movie? Oh right, The Boys literally predicted this.
This may work if there aren't sufficient alternatives. They would need to get cooperation with other states, Canada, and Mexico to not undercut CA or at least not be able to handle the volume.
Hmmm, I wonder if they'll just stop once they take Ukraine. Surely, they'll just mothball all of that gear they've spent the last two years ramping production up for.
No. Crimea is Ukraine.
More than a scientist can typically afford. See for yourself: https://www.realtor.ca/map#ZoomLevel=9&Center=49.328388%2C-122.943704&LatitudeMax=49.87486&LongitudeMax=-122.37516&LatitudeMin=48.77578&LongitudeMin=-123.51225&Sort=6-D&TransactionTypeId=2&PropertySearchTypeId=0&PropertyTypeGroupID=1&Currency=CAD&HiddenListingIds=&IncludeHiddenListings=false
These guys thinking they'll still have jobs where they can do something about his orders.
I'd like to see the source of this data.
You're exactly correct. The law as it stands is irrelevant to what these analysts think. I'm not saying Trump can call every shot, but it doesn't really get any easier to change or skirt laws he dislikes. Anyone who leans on the "but the law says..." argument is praying.
I currently have a storage server with the following config.
Multiple raid6 volumes (mdadm) -> aggregated into a lvm volume group -> lvm volumes -> encrypted with luks1 -> (no partitioning) xfs file systems mounted and used by the os
I have the following criteria: I want to keep software raid (mdadm) with multiple raid sets, xfs, and lvm. I don't mind using 2fa, but I don't want to just store my secret keys on a dongle attached to my PC because that seems to defeat the point of encryption at rest.
My questions:
-
Is there a better way to encrypt my data at rest?
-
Is there a better layer at which to apply the encryption?
I'm mostly unhappy with luks1 over a whole lvm volume and looking for alternatives.
--
Thank you everyone for these great responses! I'll be looking into these ideas :)