BluesF @ BluesF @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

889

Joined

2 yr. ago

But hark! Another track appears beside the river. Surely this will be the easier route? Surely this will not lead to yet another bridge, larger and more difficult to cross than the last? Yes, indeed, I shall take this alternative track, that I might find myself easier bridges to cross.

It depends how much boiling water you need per day. Unless you use a LOT it's more efficient (cost/energy wise) to use a kettle. Plus there's a significant upfront cost to install a boiling water tap. However, if you drink a shitload of tea, or use a lot of boiling water in cooking, it's generally better to have the on tap option.

Seriously cool piece of kit! I have no use for it whatsoever, but can't help but wish I did.

I don't need the money but I'll fuckin take it 😎

Jeans

(portmanteau of jeans and beans)

I had a "whoa" once, or perhaps something slightly more extreme. The condition wasn't, particularly - I had a lump on my finger as a kid. The first doctor said it would go away on its own, which it didn't at all, 2 years later it was much worse and started to hurt, so back we went. The next doctor suggested basically that we just cut it open and see what it was lmao, so that we did. He sliced it with a scalpel there and then, while, me, the doctor, and my dad peered at it.

As soon as the scalpel went in there was a small explosion of goo from in there and both my dad and the doctor recoiled in horror ("whoa!" lol). He proceeded to poke around in the goo hole somewhat with a needle (looking back this seems like an odd way to do things) and fished out a ~inch long hawthorn that had just been in there, chilling for the past 2 years.

What exactly does Copilot even do that would enable you to be in more than one meeting at a time?

Personally I prefer to call myself "fattened", like a pig I suppose, as this clarifies that it is something that has happened to me, not simply something that I am. It's not my fault, it's the mince pies' fault!

Neither really convey that it did hit Earth('s atmosphere) and just burned up harmlessly. The title reads like it missed, in which case it doesn't make much sense to me to mention Siberia at all.

Does it exist in humans, though? I'm fairly certain that it remains pseudoscientific in humans as well as wolves.

Oh, wait, I read point two. I stand corrected.

I understand suspension of disbelief, so you don't need invite me to try it like you're talking a kid about broccoli.

Haha, ok, I wasn't trying to be patronising - my suggestion was that you try suspending you disbelief in situations where you otherwise might not. Clearly you know what it is, I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. Jumping ahead a bit to another relevant part of your comment...

Suspension of disbelief only has meaning for an audience that already has knowledge of the material

Where I am suggesting you might suspend your disbelief is exactly that - a situation where you have knowledge that the world you're seeing is inaccurate. Anyway, I don't mean to come across as condescending, sorry about that.

Casting directors do not cast "blind" except background crowds, and even then the overall look and feel is as important as paint scheme and set decoration.

Blind casting doesn't mean you have to have no artistic vision. It just means you aren't concerned with, for example, the gender or race of the actor. I saw a production of the Little Prince a while ago where the titular prince was played by a woman. Now, given the storyline (which was presented more or less true to the book) I think it's clear that there was no philosophical motivation behind the casting... She was just small. I'm sure it was a conscious decision to cast someone small, but do you really think they specifically wanted a woman? I doubt it.

I'm talking about serious stories where everything seems to be meticulously recreated except the painful elements of society are being whitewashed for the sake of pleasing modern-day sensibilities

This specific situation I can understand. The reason I was inclined to argue with your original point, and why I jumped to Bridgerton as an example, is that I have usually seen these arguments presented in relation to things just like Bridgerton, where they really have no place... So, do you have an example?

I'd also ask, given your example, what your perspective is on modern Cowboy films still presenting the old west as predominantly white?

Sure, but the joke is skele-ton

I think he's proposing a skele-ton which is 0.01 tons, (i.e. 10kg), not a skelegram which is 10,000g. A skele-gram in this case would be 0.01g.

Even more confusing when you hear that the odds of catching a disease have increased by a %. In many ways odds can be more intuitive, but we're so used to working with simple probability that it's a total nightmare to wrap your head around at first.

Perhaps, or perhaps the casting team had other goals that aren't so obvious. While it's true there are purely capitalistic production firms, there are clearly things being made with artistic vision behind them, and sometimes that includes blind casting. Again, I suspect this is more prevalent in theatre, where audiences are more willing to accept, say, a woman playing King Lear, or black actors playing nobles in a historical setting. Because, on stage, you are already suspending lots of that disbelief - you're not looking into a throne room, you're looking at a stage - it's easier to take it a step further.

But while less is asked of you when watching a historical drama on TV, you are nonetheless suspending your disbelief. You know really that cameras couldn't have filmed this in the Victorian era, that's not really Henry VIII, and Jesus wasn't a white guy. The question is what makes it too jarring for you?

I noticed you're quite focused on the production company's intent behind the casting. Maybe it's politically/philosophically motivated, maybe purely capitalist, or maybe artistic... But you can't really know. And should it even matter to you as the viewer? I understand trying to unpick the artistic decisions behind a piece, but those of the production company? That doesn't seem like something to bring into your viewing experience - just perhaps conversations like this one on the internet.

I'd invite you to try suspending your disbelief as you might when watching the Passion of the Christ, and see if you're able to enjoy these films/shows despite the historical inaccuracies.

Jeeeesus fucking Christ. John Oliver is pretty funny but it almost doesn't feel acceptable to be laughing during some of that. Anyway, glad I didn't fall for it 😬

I got one which appeared at first to be a wrong number, just someone asking if I was Catherine or something. I politely informed them of their mistake. They kept messaging, already a bit weird, but then started saying I was "a nice man, nothing like other men" and I slapped that block button. Idk where it was going (not even a man lol, sorry love) but I'm confident it would have ended with asking me for money... Eventually.

One of these things is not like the others