Kizzie @ 1141kizzie @thelemmy.club

Posts

4

Comments

35

Joined

2 wk. ago

you are asking people to fuck merits!

funny part is, OP is saying that it is unethical for them to not compensate to these poor souls 😰

Hey, it's fair right?, if young hot lady maintains romantic or sexual relations with higher ranking military using her seduction skills to get promotion. Others soldiers are using also using their skills. so IG all animals have their weapons. Instead of spending years in battles, why don't someone should take the shortcut. who cares about defending/extending our culture? What really matter is our own self-interest.

You got opportunity here to tame him, ask him what makes one alpha?, then convince him that you are one or at least superior than him. Then, you will unlock ability to demand more share in things like food and money. But he looks like person who just argues.

You guys live in Echo chambers. You just assume that your problems and solutions are universality accepted. I don't think using word pussy is wrong. because of common usage as coward, second even if pussy means women are not courageous as men. which i think is true; very rarely saw women showing uprightness, valour or taking risks, Never heard of a story where woman did suicide assassination like killing VIP with explosions and lack of courage is accepted as woman's trait in multiple cultures. I think telling otherwise is a lie. People made word unmanliness for a reason, are you guys going to replace its usage from all books? If you think it is not lie, then you should make your case instead of pushing propaganda without properly examining and expecting that people from other cultures are going to accept your so called misogyny bullshit.

and I did not complained because I wanted sympathy, I did because I don't want them to get away with it without experiencing some backlash

It's old problem, Schopenhauer described it

When we come to look into the matter, so-called universal opinion is the opinion of two or three persons; and we should be persuaded of this if we could see the way in which it really arises.

We should find that it is two or three persons who, in the first instance, accepted it, or advanced and maintained it; and of whom people were so good as to believe that they had thoroughly tested it. Then a few other persons, persuaded beforehand that the first were men of the requisite capacity, also accepted the opinion. These, again, were trusted by many others, whose laziness suggested to them that it was better to believe at once, than to go through the troublesome task of testing the matter for themselves. Thus the number of these lazy and credulous adherents grew from day to day; for the opinion had no sooner obtained a fair measure of support than its further supporters attributed this to the fact that the opinion could only have obtained it by the cogency of its arguments. The remainder were then compelled to grant what was universally granted, so as not to pass for unruly persons who resisted opinions which every one accepted, or pert fellows who thought themselves cleverer than any one else. When opinion reaches this stage, adhesion becomes a duty; and henceforward the few who are capable of forming a judgment hold their peace. Those who venture to speak are such as are entirely incapable of forming any opinions or any judgment of their own, being merely the echo of others' opinions; and, nevertheless, they defend them with all the greater zeal and intolerance. For what they hate in people who think differently is not so much the different opinions which they profess, as the presumption of wanting to form their own judgment; a presumption of which they themselves are never guilty, as they are very well aware. In short, there are very few who can think, but every man wants to have an opinion; and what remains but to take it ready-made from others, instead of forming opinions for himself?

Since this is what happens, where is the value of the opinion even of a hundred millions? It is no more established than an historical fact reported by a hundred chroniclers who can be proved to have plagiarised it from one another; the opinion in the end being traceable to a single individual. It is all what I say, what you say, and, finally, what he says; and the whole of it is nothing but a series of assertions

.... ordinary folk have a deep respect for professional men of every kind. They are unaware that a man who makes a profession of a thing loves it not for the thing itself, but for the money he makes by it; or that it is rare for a man who teaches to know his subject thoroughly; for if he studies it as he ought, he has in most cases no time left in which to teach it

Its not about listening to themselves, they just don't think deeply. is it not that they don't trust their product, they don't have their own product, their reasoning skills are garbage

And it is probably related to our habit of web browsing things first. We should reflect on question first. and nothing should go unanswered like if someone believes "everyone have same value" then they should have reason why?

And I suggest people to read Schopenhauer essays on thinking & related topics in order to understand why people are not so smart. This is good start

I see, over policing. Here police try to solve domestic(family) disputes without registering complains & overlook trivial offenses. And in local area, people usual approach respected locals & panchayat first. because it is common sense that justice system is unnecessarily expensive & takes a lot time to deliver justice.

Omg that explains alot

Yeah, people here assumes everyone knows about their political problems. I am not from west. Have a open mind

Who are "vulnerable" people here? Criminals?

Meh, you are overreacting

Here is copied pasted version

Calling the police often escalates situations, puts people at risk, and leads to violence. Anytime you seek help from the police, you’re inviting them into your community and putting people who may already be vulnerable into dangerous situations. Sometimes people feel that calling the police is the only way to deal with problems. But we can build trusted networks of mutual aid that allow us to better handle conflicts ourselves and move toward forms of transformative justice, while keeping police away from our neighborhoods.

Don’t feel obligated to defend property—especially corporate “private” property. Before confronting someone or contacting the police, ask yourself if anyone is being hurt or endangered by property “theft” or damage. If the answer is “no,” then let it be.

If something of yours is stolen and you need to file a report for insurance or other purposes, consider going to the police station instead of bringing cops into your community. You may inadvertently be putting someone in your neighborhood at risk.

If you observe someone exhibiting behavior that seems “odd” to you, don’t assume that they are publicly intoxicated. A traumatic brain injury or a similar medical episode may be occurring. Ask if they are OK, if they have a medical condition, and if they need assistance.

If you see someone pulled over with car trouble, stop and ask if they need help or if you can call a tow truck for them. If the police are introduced to such a situation, they may give punitive and unnecessary tickets to people with car issues, target those without papers, or worse.

Keep a contact list of community resources like suicide hotlines. When police are contacted to “manage” such situations, people with mental illness are sixteen times more likely to be killed by cops than those without mental health challenges.

Check your impulse to call the police on someone you believe looks or is acting “suspicious.” Is their race, gender, ethnicity, class, or housing situation influencing your choice? Such calls can be death sentences for many people.

Encourage teachers, coworkers, and organizers to avoid inviting police into classrooms, workplaces, and public spaces. Instead, create for a culture of taking care of each other and not unwittingly putting people in harm’s way. If you’re part of a group that’s holding a rally or demonstration, don’t get a permit or otherwise cooperate with the police.

If your neighbor is having a party and the noise is bothering you, go over and talk to them. Getting to know your neighbors with community events like monthly block parties is a good way to make asking them to quiet down a little less uncomfortable, or to find another neighbor who is willing to do so.

If you see someone peeing in public, just look away! Remember, for example, that many houseless people do not have reliable access to bathrooms.

Hold and attend deescalation, conflict resolution, first-aid, volunteer medic, and self-defense workshops in your neighborhood, school, workplace, or community organization.

Street art is beautiful! Don’t report graffiti and other street artists. If you see work that includes fascistic or hate speech, paint over it yourself or with friends.

Remember that police can escalate domestic violence situations. You can support friends and neighbors who are being victimized by abusers by offering them a place to stay, a ride to a safe location, or to watch their children. Utilize community resources like safe houses and hotlines.

I am familiar with this issue, they are are marking questions as duplicate when actually they are just related questions. And users intentionally not up voting. but at least in SE users are in good faith, encourage good quality answers & avoid duplicates.

I was talking about, this post being duplicated 4 times

Funny rule

I am sorry, my server(https://thelemmy.club/) got downtime, so clicked create post button multiple times to retry. I deleted them.

I used to disagree with you, but i was new to Lemmy. Thanks for sharing

Haha, you’re soft and weak like a girl

So you are saying girls are and tend to be strong as men? Therefore it makes pussy bad word? Get hold of yourself delusional. you are swimming in bullshit & polluting others. There is reason word pussy got same meaning as "you’re soft and weak like a girl", cause girls are weak. How can woman retaliate abuse of husband? So she endures. Have you ever saw men enduring same kind of abuse by other men?

Your comparison is flawed. N word was never used to mean qualities like coward.

you can’t make assumptions about massive groups of people. Many people come to the west because they don’t agree with their culture. To assume everyone from one place is the same is racist

I think you are wrong here, you need to look at how likely this case is,how much they like western culture & How many people don't agree with their culture?

But IMO usually they(anti immigrations) are sold narrative, that it is threat to them by political parties who want easy win,third party organizations who hire lobbyists for their cause & religious groups, just like communists sell their idea. IMO such diversity is good.

Age is relevant because you were kicking up dust in an ancient thread, which is pretty rude of you

Wow https://tenor.com/view/mao-code-geass-gif-6984625968092108154

Hey, mods who agree with it, can you somehow just lock old posts? If you think it is rude.

correct, but I hope you(or anyone else) deeply reflected on limitations of your ideology

Yeah you are correct, i should not explore social media aimlessly

How age is relevant, when reason are "rude, misogyny".

gendered insult

I think it is your bias, have you ever heard person using word coward instead of pussy?

So do you guys agree that all people who use word pussy for coward are misogynist?