California does have the tallests mountain in the contiguous US. It sure as fuck isn't Mount Shasta.
Mount Whitney stands 14.5k feet tall, and it's way more fucking badass in Appearance.
Many of Colorado's mountain summits also stand taller than Shasta, and are multitudes more majestic in appearance.
As for iconic, the Appalachian mountains may not be known by individual name, they are the boy band of mountains in terms of fame in the US. Mount Washington is also extremely iconic. I hadn't even heard of Shasta till this post. St. Helens is also extremely well-known.
For those wondering, Denali is the tallest mountain in the US, as well as the tallest mountain on land in the world.
EDIT: so for clarification - Mount Everest is the highest mountain in the world, at close to 9k meters. When you measure it base-to-peak, however, Denali measures out at 5,486 meters, while Everest is only 5,200 meters.
Something notable is that though Denali is stated as the tallest mountain on land, it seems Rakaposhi in Pakistan has a base-to-peak measure of 6,000 meters. It also is the only mountain whose peak descends to base without interruption apparently.
EDIT 2:got my numbers mixed up, fixed some info.
Mt. Rainer in Washington is 14.4k and is one bad looking motherfucker as well.
Depending on how you define "base", Rakaposhi might be taller coming in at 19,357 ft.
I had to pull out Google map's topographic view for this. From base camp to peak, Rakaposhi is only 4,300 meters.
However, if you measure from the Hunza river - which Rakaposhi directly descends all the way down to - the descent looks to be approximately 5,920 meters. That is interesting.
Thanks for mentioning the Appalachians. I'm going to geek out on them a little bit now. The Appalachians may not be as big now as the the Rockies but they were plenty big enough to hold up westward expansion for a couple hundred years. Why aren't they tall? Because they are old. Why aren't they as long as some other ranges? Because they are old.
How old? They began forming more than 1.2 billion years ago and peaked during the formation of Pangea 500-300 million years ago. Were they bigger? When Pangea was breaking up they were as tall as the Himalayas and the Alps are today. Longer? The Highlands of Scotland were part of the Appalachians, the Little Atlas mountains in Morocco were part of the Appalachians. At their longest they spanned 3 modern continents and acted as a continental divide for a Supercontinent.
What were animals doing when they were forming? Land animals didn't exist, sea animals were just beginning to evolve bones. Why is there so much coal under the Appalachians? The organisms that break down plant material didn't exist yet. Ancient forests (not modern tree based forests, trees didn't exist yet, liverworts, mosses, rhododendron, and ferns) were buried whole with no decomposition. All of the carbon held in those forests was trapped under a massive amount of earth for hundreds millions of years.
I like tall mountains, but prominence is way more important to make a mountain seem special
I was with you until you started talking about Denali. What do you mean by that?
As I understand it, there are many weird aspects about measuring mountain height. From base to peak, Donali is 18k feet.
My overall understanding on how that is specifically determined is out of my understanding. I'm guessing other mountains which are taller have their bases in the ocean which puts them into a different 'category'. Denali just happens to be completely land-based.
Mauna Kea is the tallest mountain in the world, if you ignore the water.
This is like a short person who compensates by being aggressive? Mt Shasta, as noted, peaks at over 14k…. Mt St Helens only reaches around 8500.
Yeah... Now.
For now.
Just continuing its pattern of being a hothead
Me after glancing at mont blanc from my window: yeah right guys
Nice try but Mt Blanc isn't nearly as scenic or iconic. It's just an average peak on the range.
Or please go ahead and post a Pic from your window.
The mountains in Washington double as volcanoes so they tend to talk a little more smack.
Mt. Shasta is also a volcano, no?
Yeah but they don't know if it's active from what I've read.
That and Saint Helens kinda blew tf up outta nowhere.
"Pure glory?! You can talk about pure glory after you get on my level and cause at least 1 billion in damages."
Best I can do is a crummy soda brand:
Not only do I hope this is real - to me this is what twitter should be about. just witty/shitty... shwitty? comments. like when facebook used to actually be seeing your friends pages, and not endless scrolling of 85% ads.
It is a parody, but pretty damn good:
Feel the need to NSFW that but can't find a way to do it, sorry folks.
If there was any remaining doubt as to whether the blue checkmark meant anything at all...
14 KELVIN?!?!??!??!!
Man, mountain beef is the best beef
Does that mean beef you eat on a mountain? How much beef can one carry up a mountain?
I mean beef (as in fighting) between mountains, but that is a good question! If you bring the cow up alive you'll manage to transport quite a lot of beef. The best part is that the conditions may be freezing, and as such you can technically keep your beef there for a long while too.
Mt. Rainier says hi.
Spoken like someone who likes to blow its load everywhere.
♪ Mount St. Helens is about to blow up ♪
