A new look at our linguistic roots

If this article is interesting to you, and you speak English, I have a book to recommend:

Highly Irregular: Why Tough, Through, and Dough Don't Rhyme―And Other Oddities of the English Language

And a podcast with the author:

https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/corpse-corps-horse-and-worse/

It turns out there are a lot of good (as in explainable) reasons why the language is so fucked up and broken. I found this a fascinating read.

Edit: Also, check out The Great Vowel Shift.

i'm always fascinated how media makes a hype around knowledge that has been well established in the science communities for decades. and i don't think it helps, see climate overheating and ecological collapses. it'd be much better to adopt the knowledge in school curricilae early on, but i guess that'd cause too much conflict with the legitimacy of the ruling class and hegemonial narratives.

When Heggarty’s team reran the analysis with this new database, their findings broadly agreed with the earlier, farmer-origin theory, locating the origin squarely in Anatolia about 8,000 years ago. From there, some branches of the language moved eastward and gave rise to languages including Persian and Hindustani. Other branches moved west to eventually develop into Greek and Albanian. But the analysis also recognizes the steppes as playing an important role as a secondary homeland for most European languages: After one branch traveled northward from Anatolia to the steppes, it radiated from there into northern Europe, giving birth to Germanic, Italic, Gaelic, and other European language families.

Wait, this theory implies that the Iranian languages (including Scythian, Sarmatian, and Saka as well as Persian) were not part of the steppe pastoralist branch?