That is pointed criticism and correct on most counts. I wonder if irony is a productive attitude for that kind of criticism. Personally, I feel that irony is remarkable at reassuring those who already agree with the points being made. I don't think it is effective at producing change. Not that I think changing people is the goal of the article. I recently published an article of my own that touches on those issues. It was discussed here: https://beehaw.org/post/11732833.
I identify the most with that bit:
- That is, anything not declared in the post is something O.P. does not care about/is complicit with. Every expression of concern is in fact an expression of unconcern about something else; each of them merits a rebuke and you have been appointed (by yourself, but nevermind) to deliver it. Everyone but you is indifferent to the plight of the greater sage grouse and needs to be reminded of it.
Tldr, but i disagree with everything they said, and they are a puppy kicker.
/s :D
- If you’re a man and that O.P. is a woman, her facts are feelings and your feelings are facts, and those forty-seven increasingly lengthy responses you fired off were clearly a rational reaction. If she reacted negatively to them, do not forget to rebuke her for being emotional.
I take issue with this point. It builds on the basis that there are women on the internet, which we know is factually not true. There are only men and, in some communities, squeaky teenagers. (/s)
I'm bookmarking this article. It'll definitely be useful at several points in the future when I need to rebuke someone's rebuke.
🥱
