ISP Suggests That Record Labels Can Sue Torrent Client Developers * TorrentFreak
ISP Suggests That Record Labels Can Sue Torrent Client Developers * TorrentFreak
ISP Grande says that it's not liable for pirating subscribers. Torrent client devs are more directly related to piracy, the ISP suggests.
So parents can sue gun companies right?
And they can sue the state for giving out driver's license
It's just a tool...for killing, very efficient killing tool
Wait! Those torrent clients are written with programming languages! We should sue the people who made the programming languages for encouraging piracy!
And pirates are using hardware to commit their dirty deeds!
Maybe this is how technological society crumbles, one lawsuit at a time.
If I can prove that I downloaded a torrent of an AppleTV show on my Mac, will Apple sue itself?
You wouldn't download qt5
Meanwhile the writers of assembly - the root of all programming languages - are shaking in their boots.
They should sue movie producers. After all, they regularly supply the pirates with fresh wares.
It's pretty easy: there's no culpability on either side. It's not either-or. If guns and ammo and knife manufacturers are not responsible for murder than neither are ISPs and software developers responsible for piracy.
If the courts don't like that an IP isn't a person, then they can pressure congress to change the laws. Until then, everyone can go fuck off
Yup, and you can sue Sig Sauer if someone shoots you with one of their guns. You'll lose due to having no basis for their culpability, but you can try.
the difference is sig sauer has money, lawyers and a few centuries of lobbying on their side, plus being the right side of capital... your average torrent client developer has none of those to fight back with, and is the wrong side of capital.
Feel like Sig Sauer et. al. might at least make a amicus curiae though, considering the legal ramifications.
Well if that argument works out for the studios, Oneida better get ready because I'll be seeing them in court. After all, they made the spoons that I used to eat the ice cream that made me fat.
The same people that would use the "they made the software that was used for infringement" will be the ones stating that "the manufacturer of this firearm is not responsible for it being used in this mass-shooting".
Kinda funny how the main driving point behind their argument is "does this affect me and my bottom line"
plenty of legal uses of the protocol. whats different here?
e.
Grande doesn’t explain why or when developers of torrent clients should be held liable for piracy. Popular torrent clients and sites that distribute this software are typically content-neutral and don’t actively encourage piracy. That is similar to the defense Grande relies on.
just graspin at straws it seems
Plenty of legal uses. For example, it was legitimately faster for me to install deluge and torrent Ubuntu than it was to just download Ubuntu.
There's so many other legitimate uses, but that's the main one I used it for
Same with large academic datasets. You can't rely on most academics to maintain their work past publication, nor to have machines capable of serving that much data in one go.
With that logic they should sue the creators of the AV1 codec as well. Lots of pirated movies will be encoded with it....
They should sue Alan Turing and John von Neumann.
Sue the mine in China that supplied the raw materials that went into the dielectric material in the capacitors in the power supply of the computer that facilitated the downloading of illegal content….
Those materials wouldn't exist if the Big Bang didn't happen. So sue whoever made that happen.
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This had made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” ― Douglas Adams
Really funny because you can't sue a gun maker for the guns they sold killing people. I say funny but I mean that it's so depressing I have to laugh to maintain sanity.
I sue everyone in Muricaland that enables tech to pirate. Including ISPs and record labels themselves they are the content providers.
It's not a serious suggestion, they're just using this as a "fuck off" response to the record labels.
"One two three not it."
You can sue anyone for anything - doesn't mean you're going to win.
Maybe in response to this we should all download a bunch of new music, then delete it all because it's complete garbage.
You wouldn't download and then delete a car would you?
I'd like to get a Tesla so I can put a turbo 3.8 V6 in it.
lol good luck tracking down someone who releases software into the wild.
Brb downloading the piratebay on the piratebay
Sie the stupid animal that crawled out of the water so we evolved into humans, who can pirate digital goods.
Completely insane.
Good luck sueing someone that lives in an unheard of African country with a population of one. This is exactly why people release software anonymously.
laughs in Russian
Is why I like to have multiple aliases and always connect via vpn... harder to sue me if they can't figure out who I really am.
On that note, it would be really cool if there was a TOR-based github alternative (or even an I2P-based one) for hosting project repos somewhere that take-downs have no effect and servers can't be seized. Anybody aware of anything like that? then again, I'm not even sure how I would configure
git/sshto use a TOR-based server lol