it could happen to you rule
it could happen to you rule
![the background blur](https://lemmy.cafe/pictrs/image/0644f4d1-10a6-468e-8d7e-2908c859159f.webp?thumbnail=256&format=webp)
![](https://lemmy.cafe/pictrs/image/0644f4d1-10a6-468e-8d7e-2908c859159f.webp?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
see if your instance is one of them here: https://fedipact.veganism.social/
You're viewing a single thread.
I probably wouldn't use an instance if it wasn't federated to Threads
22 0 ReplySame. I’m glad the ‘default’ instances are federated, since I want to follow a bunch of folks on threads. And I’m glad that I dont have to give up my personal info to zuck to do that.
7 0 ReplyWasn't federated, or was federated?
6 0 ReplyI've always got to invert the double negatives to parse crap like this:
I probably would use an instance if it was federated to Threads.
Not exactly the same meaning, but it gets you on the right side of the negatives.
3 0 ReplyYup, that's what I meant, but like you said, it doesn't carry the exact same meaning if I wrote it like that
5 0 ReplyBest way to address this is to reword a bit:
I probably would
not useavoid using an instance that wasn't federated to ThreadsUsing "not" twice in a single sentence is generally something worth avoiding IMO.
1 0 ReplyI understood the meaning. I was clarifying the point OP was trying to make because I 100% disagree with it as worded.
1 0 Reply