What kind of land do 100 largest landowning families have that it’s not covered under other categories? (Other than timberland in the top left?)
35 0 ReplyPrivate mansions, estates, forests I would imagine
19 0 ReplyUnderwater land
9 0 Reply
I can't wait for lab grown meat.
26 0 ReplyI'm excited for the possibility of being an ethical cannibal. Imagine being able to take a tissue sample and then grow a steak that's made of you.
16 0 ReplyBelle Delphine was a pioneer with her bath water. Can she do it again?
13 0 Replyno
7 0 ReplyFinally we can join Grace in enjoying a MeBurger
5 0 ReplyGives new meaning to the word mastication
1 0 Reply
You can stop eating meat at any point. No need to wait for lab grown.
13 0 ReplySocial conditioning is a hell of a drug. I eat a fraction of the meat I used to but it's still hard to completely stop.
Imo we don't need a lot of people to become full vegetarians, we need everybody to eat less meat.
2 0 Reply
I’m shocked at how small desert is
13 0 ReplyMaybe because half of Arizona got turned into fucking cow "pastures" and alfalfa farms for some stupid reason.
11 0 ReplyFor foreign governments to buy. That way they don't have to use their own water to grow it. Not even joking give it a Google.
4 0 Reply
no way urban is that big compared to rural
does urban here include suburbia??
13 0 ReplyWhere else would suburbia belong? The images I've seen from the US looks very much like urban environment
11 0 ReplyYes it does frequently include the suburbs. Also there are LOTS of small cities that are urban - its not just NYC and Los Angelos. Its... Irvine, CA. Its... Portland, Oregon.
5 0 Reply
Cool graphic! Data sources?
12 0 ReplyPoor people of Cleveland. The ground being covered in maple syrup sure is a sticky situation.
12 0 ReplyNo section for parking lots? That would probably take up about 25% of the map
11 0 ReplyMost likely part of 'urban commercial' and the housing sections
11 0 Reply
Wyerhauser?
9 0 ReplyForestry company: https://www.weyerhaeuser.com/
4 0 Reply
daily reminder that most of the land that is used to grow livestock feed is land that is not fertile enough to grow things like wheat but can still grow things like grass
9 0 ReplyYes, you are right, for pastures. The category Lifestock feed is soybean, corn, wheat, barley and triticale, all that goes into the stomachs of monogastric animals (pigs, poultry, ... humans).
3 0 ReplyExcept its use as pasture has wrecked the ecosystem that would be there otherwise. From forcing certain plant life to driving out predators, "would still be grass" isn't really saying much when the damage is severe nonetheless.
3 0 Reply
Fuck it, united single-use zones of America
9 0 ReplyVermont as urban? Vermont? The state with the least amount of people in it?
7 0 ReplyThe locations are arbitrary, it's just visualizing total land usage. In reality everything would be intermixed
24 0 ReplyNope, it's official, we're all moving to Vermont now. Your current home will be demolished in 72 hours or less.
14 0 ReplyOP do you know where this is from its cool?
1 0 Reply
I think you'll find that Wyoming is the state with the fewest people.
You're right on your main point, though, it's not exactly Manhattan 😄
3 0 Reply
What is this supposed to be?
6 0 ReplyIt's a map of what percent of us land each thing takes up
17 0 ReplyI assume this is overall percentage across the US, and it’s not implying that certain regions are mapped to certain industries.
11 0 Reply
A more square America.
3 0 ReplyWe don't do angles here
1 0 Reply
the blue part at the top should actually read "federal, national, and state parks made up of stolen tribal lands".
5 0 ReplyI think that's true of the entire country, except maybe the desert between Phoenix and Vegas.
6 0 ReplyShould’ve defended it better😎
2 0 Reply
Mining in the US is too tiny to note?
3 0 ReplyI guess it mostly uses land vertically not horizontally
6 0 Reply
Rip South Carolina and their Rhode Island sized golf course.
3 0 ReplyCemeteries don't deserve a call-out?
2 0 Reply"Rural housing"
11 0 Replythat's where your rent control is
1 0 Reply
Most of Montana, 62% officially, is fields so that seems really inaccurate
1 0 ReplyThe position on the diagram is arbitrary, it just shows the proportion of land use type
9 0 ReplyThat makes much more sense, I wonder why they decided to post it without context. I just assumed it was some kind of "how the USA looks to a [...]" meme.
5 0 ReplyAh that makes a lot of sense. I was wondering how the Adirondacks in NY and northern Vermont are "Urban Commercial housing" and north eastern tip of Ohio is maple syrup.
2 0 Reply
Cotton
1 0 ReplyThis infographic gave me Downs Syndrome.
1 0 ReplyYou wouldn't make the same comment but referring to skin colour instead of trisomy. So please don't use trisomy 21 in such a context
4 0 Reply
Damn, Michigan is lazy asf
1 0 Reply