Semantics: What's the greater security threat to the Federation?
Semantics: What's the greater security threat to the Federation?
![the background blur](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/af10f2ac-6cd8-49e6-84d6-2d6679419d74.png?thumbnail=256&format=webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/af10f2ac-6cd8-49e6-84d6-2d6679419d74.png?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
As always: be excellent to each other, serious responses welcome, but generally keep it light-hearted.
Also, stop bringing every random person who boards the ship to the bridge!
And implement badge-entry for engineering.
21 0 ReplyLack of circuit breakers and seatbelts.
11 0 ReplyThe way I figure, if the inertial dampers fail, everyone is gooified regardless of restraints.
8 0 ReplyWhere are the inertial dampeners when in battle. Seems like every battle we have some one flying across the bridge.
4 0 Reply
Similar to surveillance, but the lack of pre-emptive warnings.
"Captain there's an unauthorized shuttle launch/transport"
"Can you use the tractor beam/get a lock on them?"
"They're too far away/too much interference"
"Can we please get a warning before the thing actually happens next time ensign?"
10 0 ReplyThe imagination of a tv show writer .... that is the greatest security threat to the federation
Ever see tv show writers in 24th century? There's a reason why they don't exist in their time period.
9 0 Reply"Help! Help! I'm being repressed!" - some 24th century ensign...
4 0 Reply