Why would we rehire him after this?

Lol if only it worked like that and there weren't a bunch of MAGA idiots still backing him. That being said though, I don't think DeSantis would be any better...

Trump became a god to that entire swath of willfully ignorant racist Americans, way back when he first attacked sitting President Obama for not being an American citizen.
Trump used the same tactic against Obama that he always uses. The same tactic he perfected in all his ridiculously public feuds with people like Rosie O'Donnell. It's simple: The more audacious the accusation, the more press coverage it gets. The bigger the lie, the more it gets repeated.
In a certain way, I still think of the entire MAGA movement as payback for America electing a Black man to be President in 2008. And I'm still shocked to think even before 2008, there must have always been that much anger and hate and fear there, among my fellow Americans. But the hate was quieter before Trump, and easier not to see unless you were looking for it.
But that's why I think Trump is so much more dangerous than DeSantis, or any other wannabe strongman autocrat). Trump's already tapped into all that pent-up American hate years ago, and Trump's completely owned it ever since. As demonstrated countless times already, he controls that hate and can use it to make his followers do or say literally anything.
- 2001-2007 Republicans were all about hating Muslims.
I think he'd be worse. He's a little smarter than trump.
The maga idiots still backing him are why it works like this.
Do you know some? If so, please for the love of democracy, find a way to smack them back into reality. There’s got to be a conversation you can have that will get through. Read up on psychology and be creative.
e: We have to rely on you because nothing else is working.
- You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.
He would be easy worse. But he would never win so in a way he would be better. The fact that we even discuss Trump having a chance to be elected is extremely sad.

"To be honest, HR is divided on whether or not to rehire you."

It's pretty funny how almost all of the things that are allowed in politics would cost one's entire career and reputation in any other sector or social structure. Then it becomes sad once you notice these patterns.

And chances are he’ll win again, because the other dude is an 80 year old man who has been continually ineffectual and who believes that America is great, despite the largest increase in poverty in American history happening under his nose. Who believes he’s the most pro union president ever, while gutting a rail strike and giving the workers less than 1/4 of what they asked for.

Maybe, it’s time to admit that our entire political system is non-functional, and needs to be remade in a way to ensure actual democracy, which our system is by definition not.

Maybe, it’s time to admit that our entire political system is non-functional, and needs to be remade in a way to ensure actual democracy, which our system is by definition not.
I think you are under the impression that the United States system of governance was meant to be a direct democracy. This is not accurate. It is, and always has been, a federal single executive constitutional republic. For better or worse, this is not a mistake of its founding.
The change you are asking for is a virtual impossibility.
- I think you are under the impression that the United States system of governance was meant to be a direct democracy.
  No, they're just bemoaning that the current democracy is bourgeois and has always been for the capitalist class, a remote minority among the people.
  It is, and always has been, a federal single executive constitutional republic. For better or worse, this is not a mistake of its founding.
  "It is what it is", you say. "It ought not to be," is what was said. You didn't answer, you just stated the issue.
  The change you are asking for is a virtual impossibility.
  So, along with "it is what it is", you're also adding on, "ain't nuthin' we can do 'bout it".
  Any more sage wisdom to add on to empty platitudes? How about a source for true proletarian democracy being impossible?
- Planes were s virtual impossibility for a long time too, and then they weren’t. Your comment is very “End of History”. Just because something was once true, does not mean that it is inevitably so forever. Nor does the founders intention of guarding against economic democracy mean that such is impossible to strive for.