Disappointment Rule

If you watch that in theatres when it came out, you would have heard the whole audience being disappointed with the end.

Disney furry psyop worked so well, that a cute twunk was a massive downgrade

bisexual furry energy is growing up watching disney's robin hood
- Robin hood did unmitigated damage to society.
  then they fucking doubled down with Zootopia.
- Oo-De-Lally!
He was gruff and should have had a beard and looked like a bear, not a twunk.
Disney fans love a himbo since Kronk was a smash hit. But the expectations and delivery in this one were weird.
The live-action was slightly better on this since dude looked a little more evenly grown and less like a 17 year old on poorly manufactured steroids.
- This, the overall body shape and design should match the one of the beast.
  not again cute tinks, but the change was so drastic.
  A good example is shrek and Shrek 2.
  Fiona's transformation wasn't so drastic,. and in Shrek 2, Shrek's transformation made sense. he was handsome, but still maintained a shrekness. by body size, large nose...
  I'm trying to think of more transformations,
- He was gruff and should have had a beard and looked like a bear, not a twunk.
  I think the beard thing would have been wrong for the time period (that the movie was made). I think beards were pretty iconoclastic and relatively rare for 1991 for anyone under 50 or 60. It would have made him seem like he was old. He definitely should have been aged better, though, total agreement. It honestly looks like someone took a teenager's skin and stretched it over a 'perfect' mask.