GOG Has Had To Hire Private Investigators To Track Down IP Rights Holders
GOG Has Had To Hire Private Investigators To Track Down IP Rights Holders
GOG Has Had To Hire Private Investigators To Track Down IP Rights Holders
Years ago, I worked for WEA Record (Warner Bros), and one of our labels was Rhino Records, who liked to release great reissues and compilations of our-of-print albums and artists.
They did it by the book at first, getting permission from the copyright holders, who were happy to see their stuff back in print, and get royalty checks again, especially since most of them were getting older, and didn't mind an extra income stream as they headed into retirement, even if it was small.
There were some cult classics that they wanted to release, but couldn't find the copyright holders. After a while, they decided to go ahead and release that albums anyway, but put the royalties into escrow. When/if the rights holder came forward, their royalties would be waiting for them.
It seemed like a reasonable, moral way to handle the situation, unlike the way record companies usually do business, which is to just steal as much as they can, and if they get sued, bury the plaintiff in expensive litigation. Rhino Records, and the people who worked there, always seemed like a relatively honorable outfit, by comparison.
There were some cult classics that they wanted to release, but couldn’t find the copyright holders. After a while, they decided to go ahead and release that albums anyway, but put the royalties into escrow. When/if the rights holder came forward, their royalties would be waiting for them.
Yeah...
Having gone out for drinks with enough people who deal with financial fraud and the like, here is how that plays out:
Well if you went out for drinks with people, I'm sure the record company is evil after all.
aka the OpenAI playbook
uh oh openai bots and ai-fanbois don't like hearing that rofls
I’m trying to buy 50% of my games on Gog because they avoir DRM and 50% on Steam because they’re great Linux supporters.
Still I can understand why Steam is ahead in terms to f sale as GOG has some progress to do.
90% of games on steam are drm free. The only "drm" for most is a single dll that loads the steam overlay and cloud API. Remove the dll and the game is drm free.
Hell most games also support just adding a txt file to the root folder with the appID which just disables the "drm".
Outside of extremely large triple A games you basically don't have a single game on steam that has mandatory drm.
While that's true, GOG also is intended to let you download an offline installer. If GOG dies, you still have the game, as long as you saved the installer. If GOG changes the terms of their service or software, they have little leverage.
There are ways to archive Steam games, but it's not the "normal mode of operation". If Steam dies, you probably don't have your games. If Steam's terms of service or software changes, they have a lot of leverage to force new changes through.
Some other wrinkles:
How do you know if a Steam game is DRM free or not?
How do you install such games without Steam through Linux? Is it just an .exe and you click on it as I haven’t done it since probably the early 00’s?
Where download link?
I'm more like 90/10, because GOG still refuses to port their Galaxy client to Linux. At this point I don't even really want to use it since Heroic is good enough, but it really sucks feeling like a second-class citizen, compared to Steam, which goes out of its way to provide a top tier experience on Linux. I'd even be fine with them adopting Heroic as an officially-supported client (provide links and whatnot on the website next to Galaxy), I just need some indication that they care.
Most games I own on Steam are DRM-free anyway, so I'd be supporting GOG more out of principle than anything.
I should support them more
https://www.gog.com/en/patrons
Launched the other day if you want to throw a bit of money to their cause
This is my time to shine
Now do Black and White
If only they could solve the rights problem with No One Lives Forever.
No idea if safe or not.
Dammit you beat me to it!
posted the exact same thing... loved those games.
I'm just waiting for the day they get the rights to the games No One Lives Forever 1 & 2 from back in the early 2000's.
Loved those games, especially 2... 60's setting, female spy protagonist.... Excellent games.
Honestly, it might be better to just do a new, similar game in the same genre and theme. NOLF is pretty long in the tooth now. Hard to compete with current shooters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Operative:_No_One_Lives_Forever
The Operative: No One Lives Forever (abbreviated as NOLF) is a first-person shooter video game developed by Monolith Productions and published by Fox Interactive, released for Windows in 2000.
That's a quarter-century ago now.
It was followed by a sequel in 2002, entitled No One Lives Forever 2: A Spy in H.A.R.M.'s Way.
Almost as long.
I mean, I don't think that the actual IP from those games is necessary to make a similar game to scratch the itch.
I’m pretty sure they’ve been on GOG for a while now.
The games are listed on GOG, basically as games that have existed but they are not available to purchase.
So, it happened once. And they hired one private investigator. Not that it isn't interesting, but why exaggerate everything?
Remaining quotes from article:
that's not exaggerating anything. it's merely saying it has happened at least once before.
Okay, so grammatically, in perfect tense we can use plural to mention a thing that has happened at least (or exactly) once? Wouldn't using a plural imply multiple, when the known fact is singular?
"investigators" is plural tho so that is indeed wrong