NY Times cited 29 times to justify decision limiting trans healthcare

Meanwhile, other mainstream media newsrooms treated the U.S. v. Skrmetti case as an opportunity to center coverage around the expected result.

4 comments

Important distinction: it was cited 29 times [by non-parties to the case who filed amicus briefs carrying no legal weight].

It was not cited 29 times in the actual ruling.
- Good point. But the fact there were 29 trans-dubious quotes for those amicus briefs to pull does tell us about the NYT's coverage bias.
NYT as a whole hasn't really been neutral or "dedicated to journalistic objectivity" for a long time now.

Famous are their countless pieces blaming democrats for losing elections because they're not republican enough.

They bear a fair share of the blame for how the USA got to where it is today.
Holy fucking shit tinyurl 😂