You mean the voters can know, expect many to say the coming months 'the established parties are too powerful, if we vote on him again he can become the biggest party and then he can realise his plans'. Not gonna happen, but I'd say it's too soon to be sure it actually was for the better.
There's the SP, an immigrant-skeptical left wing party.
And yet it hasn't gotten all the votes that Wilders got - because a lot of people think the PVV is fighting for their labourers - when in practice it isn't at all.
The PVV talked about restricting immigration, voted against because Wilders is half Indonesian and his wife Hungarian.
The PVV talked about robbing the 'woke elite'. Wilders received millions which he didn't give to the 'silent majority', Henk and Ingrid. Wilders himself then can be called 'woke' by his own measure.
The PVV talks about freedom but wants to make life harsher for everybody.
If those people want to 'worship' someone as a leader, they gotta look at the SP, not the PVV. That party actually comes up for the labourer.
And the SP is also for actual less bureaucracy - not more by making all sorts of exceptions to rules and exceptions.
Thing is, you gotta tell that to PVV voters to sell it to 'em. Tell 'em the SP is against woke, and that the PVV became woke, by thinking it's a special snowflake.
Now let's just hope no one will ever again claim to be open to forming a coalition with these xenophobic populist moron clowns (yes I'm looking at you Yesilgöz)
Rutte-I, anyone?
This isn't the first time. Last time we had a properly left-dominated cabinet (and even then, it was with the back then centrist CDA) was in 1972-1977.
The Dutch government, a coalition between Wilders’ far-right PVV, the populist Farmer-Citizens Movement (BBB), the centrist New Social Contract (NSC) and the liberal People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), had scheduled crisis talks Tuesday morning to discuss Wilders’ demands for stricter asylum measures.