Francis, on paper. They'll come after him for being accused of ignoring child abuse allegations. His local advocates on more progressive-leaning sources here are focefully pushing that it's a plant from the conservative side to try to keep him out of the running.
I have no awareness either way, but he seems to be perceived as a Francis continuist, for what that's worth.
Which, of course, in a lifetime position with no offramp is no guarantee of what he'll do. We'll see, I suppose.
I don't think that's the perception of him. The real perception seems to be that he's okay with what Francis did but is a little more conservative. I mean here is what the BBC is saying:
There had been talk that cardinals felt the new pope would need to be someone who would take forward Pope Francis's legacy of reaching out to those on the margins, but also bring along with him a wide spectrum of those within the Church, including those Pope Francis was sometimes at loggerheads with.
Now I don't know about you, but to me that's BBC talk for he's about to walk some shit back. That's BBC talk for enough with this fucking radical Francis Pope it's time to get back to real Catholic shit. That's how I read it.
Idk if this was recently edited but on Wikipedia it says he has used phrases like “gender ideology”, has opposed women joining some kind of religious group or activity, and has opposed teaching about gender in Peru. He’s a conservative bigot, as far as I can tell.
From what little I've read more like Francis, which isn't surprising considering he appointed the majority of those who just voted.
Apparently he's a bit more moderate. Similar focus on the poor and immigrants, which apparently Leo 13 was as well (name choice is also a statement, so reading up on whoever has the name before might be worthwhile). But slightly more conservative in regard to lgbtq and women.