Got a three day suspension for agreeing with someone else who thought murdering one's own parents is worse (more sinister) than plotting to assassinate Trump. I said it was the lesser of two evils.
Got suspended for agreeing that plotting to assassinate the president is "the lesser of two evils" compared with murdering one's own parents.
I just found out that I got banned permanently for saying someone got burned because Trump and Musk failed to pay them. They said it was violent rhetoric.
I don't have context, but you might have been baited into that conversation by somebody whose goal was to get participants banned. The reason I say this is that it's such a strange topic to start with. The two options don't seem to have anything to do with each other, and both options are violent.
It was a news article posted in the r/Wisconsin sub about the kid who killed his parents and plotted to start a violent, extreme right-wing revolution. The headline said something like "Wisconsin teen killed parents and planned on killing the President." In the first paragraph it said "...he murdered his parents, and planned to do something even more sinister." There were a lot of posts questioning that sentence, (like, "why is that more sinister?") and I replied to one of them saying "It isn't, it is the lesser of two evils."
That comment got removed (and I think a LOT of others in the thread) and I got a three day suspension for advocating violence. Calling it evil is not advocating for it. It was brought on by an auto-mod, and the appeal was denied a little too quickly for me to believe it was actually seen by a real human, as they claim.
I got a 3 day ban because I said it would be cool if a white dude beat the shit out of this white lady who kept screaming racist remarks at a Spanish guy.
Temp bans now may results in permabans from the site now i noticed quite a few people posted that they were banned sitewide as soon as their bans lifted. Especially around the site wide purges that began since January