Also, what is the game plan here? To sell GMO exhibits to zoos? To try to do a Jurassic Park, but without dinosaurs?
Releasing wolves in Yellowstone stabilised the ecosystem there. Releasing direwolves on Wall St might stabilise the economy.
Might need to make the location change to Pennsylvania Ave for a greater effect.
In an ideal world, it'd be to de-extinct fairly modern things that filled a niche that is no longer being filled. This is far from an ideal world though, and the reason in this world is to make press releases to get people talking about it so they can raise more money while not creating anything of actual value.
Okay let's play that out... Everyone gets excited, they make big strong wolves and get funding... Now what?
They've got a pack of extra big wolves raised under human care. Do they kill them? Do they sell them? Do they open their own park? Do they just keep them for study? Do they just leave the gate open and let them go?
Probably start with one or a few cool scientists with that original purpose, then by the time it can take life it's gone through the enshittification machine.
The point is to get people excited so they can get funding to keep developing the technologies that will make this kind of genetic engineering commercially viable
Sure... But now they've got these wolves for the next 14 years
They can't "reextinct" dire wolves or release them, so they're now in the zoo business one way or the other
To say they did?
And now they have a pack of XL sized wolves... That's not like making a glow in the dark cat, that's either the main plan or a very big problem
Same question: If a species evolves to adapt to a changed environment, is the original species extinct?
Yes, yes it is. That’s why a species ‘going extinct’ doesn’t always mean that it suddenly died off.
I think the term for that is chronospecies?
Nah that's a great way to start a conversation
Love this one
Haha ... but seriously ... does it? I don't think so. Now if they brought back that rhino species that just went extinct that would count.
most genetic differences happen on the biochemical level, i.e. different hormones and metabolism. superficial appearance is only a (very) small part of what defines a species. so i guess the answer is: not really, no.
They did have the genome, right? Why not just clone that? They could then add mutations in the amount that normally occurs in grey wolf populations to get a sufficiently diverse population going.
Fill in the gaps with frog DNA
