A primary argument anti-kind people tend to use is that people can be peer pressured into being someone they aren't, aka being told to transition by society. While this is a valid worry, the actual occurrence is very, very low. The best thing to do is not oppress others, let live, let expression be free, and the chances are people will be their true selves and nobody will feel the need to question someone's existence.
What if I have actually received significant training in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy strategies and their applications? I can be your femboy therapist as long as you only need CBT!
(i thinksies tranny is evil wrord... im pretti sur, pls correct me if im wrong)
alsuu i dun lik how u put de evil bad wrords all undr de fems... lik... womn aren't... a fetish or... always sissy... neithr are men n bois... i rlli dun lik feelins from dis one... ;(
But saying “NOT [evil word]” is kind of important when you are trying to draw boundaries and inform people. If you are vague about the word that shouldn’t be associated with femboys, then people can claim ignorance.
Also, the one with the female symbol is not about females, it is about things femboys are not: Not girl, not fetish, not egg.
Does that make sense? Let me know if you need more clarification. 😊
ahaaa, see, dis mek mor sens.. bt alsuu... thn why is the table not:
<femboy flag or symbol or word>
❌ or som othr word
supr pretty boi
supr pretty girl
man
woman
u see my point?...
now its:
♂
♀
a man
not womn
ur fren <3
not sissy
human being
not here to please curiosity
ur luvd one
not tranny
which... i wud say dis cud be falsely interpreted vrri easily. dis rlli is a table wif male column havin comfi words, n female column havin "not " + uncomfy_word...
i see the point, i kno dis post is not evil n i believe peeps correctin me on stuff r correct <3
bt i wan to say, dis vrri mch cn be falsely interprtd...
or rathr: if the female symbol were replavd wif transfem flag, peeps would be way more aggrsiv bout dis one i thinksies
n now ur obligated to commnt agn, becuz i but the "but actulli i thinksies i hav point" part at end of commnt...
I think she feels that the things listed under woman are being synonomized or otherwise associated with "woman", and doesn't like that. I don't read it that way, but I can definitely see how she is, as the headers on each side work to that effect
I don't think they're implying that women are any of those things, they're saying they aren't those things. Also sometimes it's necessary to say evil words to describe what not to call you. Censoring can cause confusion (unintended or bad faith intentional confusion) saying what not to call you removes all ambiguity.
im jus vrri senstiv with evil bad words.. i dun lik em, cuz them make peeps, including me uncomfi. i believe onli dum peeps use evil bad words cuz theyr too lazy to come up with bettr, tru insults. bt yes, in dis case it mek sens... fine. u won... ;(