A federal law enacted in 2022 stipulates that the president must give Congress at least 30 days notice before firing an inspector general, as well as reasons for the firing—none of which occurred.
So... he didn't? Like, I get that there's a "what are you gonna do about it" where law only restrains an executive if someone with power stops them (including underlings just not following illegal orders like they're supposed to), but this shouldn't be reported as "he fired them", but "he's trying to illegally fire them". Media and politicians shouldn't just take it as done. It's an illegal act and should be framed as such. Don't just accept every order he makes as valid.
Similarly, the firing is only real if someone actually stops them from going back to work. If they show up on Monday, then some individual person is going to have to obey an illegal order to stop them from entering their office. Make individual people legally responsible for implementing the order. I'm sure someone will, but don't comply in advance and don't excuse the people who implement it. Underlings also have a lot more risk of legal exposure and you want them as a group to worry about themselves when they're tasked with making the fascism happen.
Go curl up in a ball and cry. You've made Trumpism an unstoppable force in your mind and preemptively surrendered, so you have nothing of value to add to this conversation.
Well technically it isn't illegal until a court says it is. So you need the alledgedly in the front. But can you really blame them for not labeling it illegal. They know they would be retaliated against.
Mr. Sergio Gor
Director of Presidential Personnel
The White House
Dear Mr. Gor:
I am writing in response to your email sent to me and other Inspectors General earlier this
evening wherein you informed each of us that “due to changing priorities, your position as
Inspector General . . . is terminated, effective immediately.”
As Chairperson of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE), I
recommend that you reach out to White House Counsel to discuss your intended course of
action. At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss
Presidentially Appointed, Senate Confirmed Inspectors General.
Specifically, based upon the 2022 amendments to the Inspector General Act of 1978, the
President must notify Congress 30 days prior to removal of an IG and provide “substantive
rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons” for such removal. 5 U.S.C. § 403(b), as
amended by the section 5202(a) of the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022
(Title LII, Subtitle A, of P.L. 117-263, 136 Stat. 2395, 3222). The requirement to provide the
substantive rationale, including detailed and case specific reasons, was added to better enable Congress to engage on and respond to a proposed removal of an Inspector General in order to protect the independence of Inspectors General.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me at Hannibal.Ware@sba.gov.
Sincerely,
Hannibal “Mike” Ware
CIGIE Chairperson
Cc:
Rand Paul, Chairman, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affiairs
Gary Peters, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs
James Comer, Chairman, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Gerald Connolly, Ranking Member, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform