Remi Bateman, 9, was born without a left hand and struggles with simple tasks. Her family's health insurer deemed that a robotic arm was "not medically necessary."
Also, the other thing that gets me is this: most health insurance companies deny claims based on the claim not being a "medical necessity".
Regardless of the abuse of that - partly subjective - evaluation of medical necessity for greedy purposes, isn't the United States supposed to be a rich country?
I get the medical necessity argument when a cash-strapped healthcare system in a poor country tries to distribute the limited pool amongst as many recipients as possible. But this argument being thrown in the face of insured patrons in a country as rich as the US is totally out of line.
Or said another way, Americans should not be content with "medical necessity" but should demand "the best there is".