Recursion

If we all collectively agree to just pass it on, then either:

It's infinite, and it just passes on forever, or...
It's not infinite and somebody at the end has no choice, in which case nobody in charge of a lever has killed anyone

So yeah, I say pass it on.

Except that somewhere down that chain someone is almost certainly going to choose to kill people, so by passing the trolley on down to them you're responsible for killing a lot more than if you ended it right now.
And since every rational person down the line is going to think that, they'll all be itching to pull the "kill" lever first chance they get. So you know that you need to pull the kill lever immediately to minimize the number of deaths.
- Only the person pulling the lever is responsible for his/her action though. There is a difference between passively passing on and actively murder someone
- I guess then the issue would be: do you ever find out the result of your actions? If no, then I guess it's sort of a "glass half empty/full" kind of thing, because you could just pass it on and assume the best and just go live your life quite happily.
  Although if you did find out the result, imagine being first, pulling the lever and then finding out nobody else would have.
If it's infinite, you'd basically be gambling that no evil person exists.
If it's infinite (up to the current human population), we're all tied up on the tracks. Unless we're leaving out the exact number of people that would bring it to approximately the full population, I guess.
As long as I'm not on the tracks, I'll take the hit and kill one instead of risking a potential genocide.

Someone needs to stop tying people to those train tracks or this trolley problem will never go away.

Step in front of the train: Tell your manager this whole project is dumb, provide a list of reasons why it's a bad idea and explain you are prepared to resign rather than enable its further development.

MULTI-TRACK DRIFTING!! Which also kills the other lever guy, bonus!

KANSEI DORIFTO

Double it and I'll do it myself

Yeah, who even needs a trolley?

Just keep doubling forever until the number is more than everyone alive, free s-risk emergency button.

This might cause a buffer overload that crashes the programming and we can escape the matrix together once and for all
- But what if we are all NPCs?

Napkin math, from the last time I saw this:

I’ve been thinking about this. I estimate a few people per 1000 would do an atrocity for no reason if they were guaranteed no consequences, and the deaths if the switch is pulled are 2^(n-1) for the nth switch. The expected deaths will cross 1 somewhere in the high single-digits, then (since it’s outcome*chance), so the death minimising strategy is actually to pull yours if the chain is at least that long.

Edit: This assumes the length of the chain is variable but finite, and the trolley stops afterwards. If it's infinite obviously you pull the switch.

Could you elaborate what you are analysing here? If I dont misinterpret the model, the option where you dont double the victims minimizes deaths every time.
- Ah, but then you're giving the opportunity to the next guy to kill even more, if he wants. Most people obviously won't want to do that, but a rare few will, and the body count gets so big so fast that it only takes a few switches before that's a bad risk.
  I was expecting a bigger number of switches, but I guess that's just another example of humans being bad at tracking the consequences of large quantities.

Half-pull the lever so that the points get stuck midway between the two tracks. That should derail the trolley. Someone could conceivably still get hurt, but it improves everyone's chances.

(What? You mean it isn't a literal trolley that has to obey the laws of physics? Damn.)

News next day, 10 dead in derailment.
- Ten baby puppies to be exact
Philosophy problems vs all real world problems

Modern financial system in one picture.

There is one person in danger.

Now I pull the lever.

Now there are two _______

person in dangers
- I'm afraid you failed the wug test, or rather one of many wugs test.

If we keep doubling, will I eventually be a person on the tracks? There are a finite number of people, so eventually I would be, right? So, passing the buck would be equivalent to handing my fate to a stranger.

OTOH, if there are an infinite number of people, then this thought experiment is creating people out of thin air. Do these imaginary people's rhetorical lives even matter?

Either way, it seems better to kill 1 person at the start.

If it creates infinite number of people, it could solve world hunger with some good ol' Soylent green thinking. Although you might want to figure out how to slow down the trolley at some point.

This is a screenshot from here https://neal.fun/absurd-trolley-problems/

I did it and it was fun but the one in the post wasn't there and neither does the font and layout fit.

Just walk away and assume the original engineer put safety measures in place.

If you pull the lever after the trolley's first set of wheels has passed the switch but before its last set of wheels has passed the switch then you'll derail the trolley and everyone lives.
- Except the guy in the trolley
- Yeah, not a bad answer! I’d assume someone is on the trolley too, but that’s just an assumption and, hey, maybe they would survive the wreck anyway!

Choosing the second option will trap an infinite people for eternity in this problem, because it would never stop

Oh I promise you it'll stop, just with a greater death toll. It probably wouldn't take that long to stop either.
You should only be released once someone decides to let all of their track people die.

Damn. That’s the politician way of thinking!!!

I don't have to be a soldier on anyone's ethical recursion war, so since the default position is set to kill 1 person, that gets done by the problem itself and the whole thing is solved without me having to do anything.

As a further bonus, now the lever people on the next branches are free to get out of the levels and go release the other prisoners.

„I pull this lever and suddenly it’s not my problem anymore“

"hey hun i've got an exciting business opportunity for you!!1!"

The main problem with this is: is there a finite number of people? and if I pass it on do I count as part of the pool that will end up on the tracks?

To me this basically says are you the kind of person to deal with a problem or pass it on to someone else

It doesn't seem like the problem in question is yours to begin with though. Maybe the train will get stopped or people will get released.

por qué no los dos

Sounds like TikTok challenges. Oh boy.

go back to reddit
Apart from making it political for no reason, how on earth did you come to the conclusion that doubling the kill count and putting the responsibility on someone else makes you a decent person?