12mo ago

World of Warcraft’s $90 Mount Is So Popular the In-Game Auction House Is Selling Out of WoW Tokens

www.ign.com

World of Warcraft’s $90 Mount Is So Popular the In-Game Auction House Is Selling Out of WoW Tokens - IGN

MMORPG @lemmy.ml

lorty @lemmy.ml

12mo ago

World of Warcraft’s $90 Mount Is So Popular the In-Game Auction House Is Selling Out of WoW Tokens - IGN

www.ign.com /articles/world-of-warcrafts-90-mount-is-so-popular-the-in-game-auction-house-is-selling-out-of-wow-tokens

31 comments

I guess if this was all I did outside of work and sleep, I'd probably buy it. Mailbox and auction house access is priceless.
But, I got shit to do and mouths to feed, so, I don't WoW no mo'.
- These headlines keep saying $90 mount but it's basically "$90 access the mailbox and auction house from anywhere, and also get a mount".
  
  But also, isn't the reason these WoW Tokens are low is because people are trading their in-game gold for it instead of actually paying $90 cash??
  
  But that's worse!
- It’s kind bad that it’s only for a limited time. People who are not paying now will have a mechanical disadvantage that cannot be overcome.
  I wouldn’t mind as much if this was always available, but locking it up after a time feels like it’s selling limited time cheats.
  
  I think it will be common enough that they can easily access an auction house when they need it in the world. They may also introduce another one in the future, but at a higher price.
- Mailbox and auction house access is priceless.
  Create the problem, sell the solution.
  There's no reason not to let all players access their mail and auction house anywhere through the menus, except that Blizzard has decided to paywall that 'feature'.
I already disrespect WoW and Blizzard players in general. This is entirely in character for them.
A feature that costs Blizzard nothing, given an obscene price larger than any game or expansion they've ever sold, dangled with rationality-undermining time pressure, and using some bullshit tokens for artificial scarcity.
Only legislation will stop this.
Nothing inside a video game should cost real money.
If we allow this to continue, there will be nothing else.
- Nothing inside a video game should cost real money.
  I wouldn't go that far, otherwise you would also kill off essentially third parties producing content a la Second Life or the asset stores in various game engines as well as services provided by players to other players.
  
  Developing a video game is not "inside a video game."
  When somebody's playing raid sherpa or whatever, pay them in gold.
  Even if stopping this cuts off some legitimate niche - that beats letting it swallow the entire industry.
- Only legislation will stop this.
  Disagree. Let the whales waste their money, I have plenty of other options. In fact, indie gaming is better than it has ever been.
  I certainly don't like that type of revenue model, but I don't think it should be banned, especially since the alternatives are plentiful and growing.
  
  You're a libertarian who has personally told me corporations have unlimited right to manipulate people out of their money.
  Sorry if I'm misremembering - you might've said "exploit."
  
  I disagree with letting whales waste their money.
  Video game design has changed to specifically cater to whales and ignore regular gamers.
Booooo.
They'll keep doing it if it keeps working

31 comments