Google Is Stuffing Annoying Ads Into Its Terrible AI Search Feature
Google Is Stuffing Annoying Ads Into Its Terrible AI Search Feature
The notoriously unreliable "AI Overviews" that Google forces to the top of search results will now come with sponsored ads.
Google's notoriously wonky AI Overviews feature — you know, the one that repeatedly makes up facts and literally tells users to eat rocks — is about to get a whole lot more annoying.
On Thursday, the tech giant announced that its AI-generated search summaries will now begin to show ads above, below, and within them, as a way of demonstrating that the technology is capable of actually making money.
It will also serve to assuage concerns that AI chatbots could eat into search ad revenues, which are Google's biggest cash cow.
Now, if you search how to get a grass stain out of jeans, as seen in an example in Google's blog post, you'll get an AI summary which contains a carousel of relevant website links, plus a heavy helping of "Sponsored" ads for stain removers. Revolutionary stuff.
You guys can hate on this but I, for one, have always dreamed of unreliable search results with links to relevant businesses embedded within the text. If only a voice assistant could read them out loud and also remind me to drink Pepsi every other paragraph, we’ll finally have achieved the promise of the Internet.
Nah man, you want New Coke. Catch the wave.
Personally, I won't be happy until there are unskippable video ads before two pages of sponsored results with an AI summary somewhere in the middle of the third page of search results.
Of course there should be popups when advancing between search results pages.
AI as far as big tech is concerned is simply a way to "fix" search engines so that they don't do the awful crime of fundamentally segregating ads from search results.
it is literally the whole damn point of shoving AI down everybodies throat...
it is literally the whole damn point of shoving AI down everybodies throat...
To be fair, it didn't start out that way. A lot of tech companies just didn't want to be seen as being behind while OpenAI was making shockwaves around the globe. Iirc, after ChatGPT hit the mainstream a couple years ago, Google's CEO was said to have sent a company-wide email demanding their own AI research become their number 1 priority.
Now that they finally have their own competitive model, they have to justify why they spent hundreds of millions of dollars over numerous years on this tech. Unfortunately for the rest of us, this just means enshittification will reach new levels... sigh...
"This other company is lying about how good their product is and everyone is buying their bullshit. We can't miss the bandwagon!"
Cool, now it's terrible and annoying. Use another search engine.
Done with Google. Now paying $5 a month to use Kagi.com. Worth it.
In case anyone reading this is curious, Kagi is not capable of storing the impossibly vast and expensive data storage and speeds required to query large indexes of the internet, and so leverages Google and Bing indexes in its search, which is exactly what SearXNG and DuckDuckGo both do for free.
What you pay for is honestly a fancy UI and the ability to quality control the search results for them, again already done for free by other search engines.
Same. Completed my switch this week on all my devices. No regrets. The results are excellent and well organized and it’s really useful.
Next project is to add the rest of my family to the family plan
Yup. I signed up to their unlimited a while ago, so I was happy to not notice this at all. 🙂👍
Honestly, switching over to SearXNG was the best choice I ever made. Not only do I not have to see this AI bullshit, but it's so refreshing to not have to append "reddit" to the end of nearly every search I do to find anything even remotely useful. Being able to self-host it is also really nice now that I've gotten it and nginx set up.
It ain't perfect, but the last time I felt like I discovered such a big improvement to using the Internet was when I found out about ad-blockers.
why would any of google's customers pay to stuff its ads into such a broken feature?
it's like embossing your logo within a toilet bowl -- sure, a lot of people will get to see it but mostly only when it's submerged in shit.
because the feature works more than 1/3 the time (in my experience).
I sure hope there is some mechanism to compensate content creators because without traffic, there will be no new articles.
if it was terrible before then this doesn't change anything
&udm=14might still work for a while.On the upside, maybe the ads won't be as horrible as the AI results.