Aussie government study finds AI summaries might “create more work” for humans

Lots of people seem to like them. I've read several AI summaries also here on Lemmy. And they kind of always miss the nuance. Oftentimes they entirely miss the point. So much that it sometimes becomes wrong.

One evaluator highlighted this problem by calling out an AI summary for being "wordy and pointless—just repeating what was in the submission."

Basically sums up my view of AI generated text, it has a certain waffle to it that is very distinctive, regardless of the source.

Clickbait.

They tested it on a single, year old model (Llama2-70B), which is way below state of the art.