Context

"crushing it" might be a bit superlative but sure

So HR left us with just two choices, assured us they were the best of the best, and of course it's two geriatrics.

... one of whom is a rehire that tried to lynch us when we laid him off the first time. Good job HR, you wonder why people hate you.

*someone who you'd already fired and then tried to blow up the building reapplied...

What a perfect analogy, now let's talk about why your company only opened up the application process to two ancient terrible people.

And had already been fired from said position...

This whole crushing it narrative... Are we going to pretend like all working Americans aren't struggling?

Like sure Biden as corpse is better than Trump but he's not more likeable and he isn't doing a good job.

Why are these the choices!?!?! lol

Interviews are way too heavily weighted and the most subjective part of a job application. Go for the data.

What's the context for "were crushing it"?

It's okay because trying to blow up the building was an official act. The guys he appointed decided so.

America wants socialism, but our two parties rather have fascism.

You probably wouldn't hire a convicted felon either, but here we are.

"were crushing it" as I'm crushing thousands of Palestinians under rubble made by US bombs that he gleefully supplied to a warmongering fascist?

But when hiring for a job, you don't only have two choices you have an entire pool of candidates which you can vett.

This is like your recruiter telling you that they narrowed down all the candidates for you, you have no say in that process and you can pick between the two worst candidates.

You don't have to hire either of them

Crushing it? Wow, we have different understandings of what "crushing it" means.

That's what got me thinking.

Look, the guy might have been fantastic and sharp years ago, but mental decline at that age happens and happens fast sometimes.

The question I'm asking isn't what will be the fate of the world if he gets reelected, such an old man in office, my question is what might be mismanaged or handles poorly NOW, because we just saw how incapable he is of pretty basic stuff, and he's already at the helm of a huge counter making gigantic decisions that affect billions one way or another.

I don't wish him any I'll will, but I think there should be an age limit on political office, not to mention far stricter cognitive testing. We need our world leaders to be the sharpest, quickest, on-point minds the country has to offer.

"cRuShInG iT"
HURRRRRR

Is "Andy" here related to "Ted" in some way? That's a pretty uncommon surname.