Does the Coalition’s case for nuclear power stack up? We factcheck seven key claims
Does the Coalition’s case for nuclear power stack up? We factcheck seven key claims
Cheaper electricity, less emissions and ready by 2035 are some of the Coalition’s core promises on nuclear energy, but are they backed by evidence?
![Does the Coalition’s case for nuclear power stack up? We factcheck seven key claims](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/88c779f8-d7ef-470c-bfad-36565eb2e19b.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
Cheaper electricity, less emissions and ready by 2035 are some of the Coalition’s core promises on nuclear energy, but are they backed by evidence?
tl;dr - no
Backed by evidence? It'd certainly be a first for a Coalition policy.
13 0 ReplyMashed potatoe mashed potatoe
4 0 ReplySpoiler alert: no they do not stack up
4 0 ReplyThis is the best summary I could come up with:
The Coalition has made a range of claims about what nuclear energy could do for Australia, and why it is better than building solar and wind.
What is the reality?
We factcheck the key claims.
The original article contains 35 words, the summary contains 35 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
1 0 ReplyThis is the best summary I could come up with:
The Coalition has made a range of claims about what nuclear energy could do for Australia, and why it is better than building solar and wind.
What is the reality?
They lied.
I’m a human and fuck the LNP.
5 0 Reply