Stack Overflow's CEO doesn't understand Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow's CEO doesn't understand Stack Overflow
jlericson.com
Stack Overflow's CEO doesn't understand Stack Overflow
47 comments
-
-
Stack Overflow has a CEO? WTF for? It's a repository of information. All the LLMs have already ripped a copy of the site, so where were they planning to generate revenue?
I hope someone starts a version and integrates it with activitypub and then users can donate towards the hosting costs.
Stack Overflow is supposed to be the wiki of developers, not a fucking business. I hate these greedy fucks. "let's make money from other people's time and effort" 🤮🤮🤮
-
There is https://codidact.com/ which is an open source alternative to Stack Overflow
-
Thanks for sharing
-
Have they incorporated the data from StackExchange?
-
-
It seems you're unclear on what a CEO is. Even non profit organizations have CEOs (though stackoverflow is very much a for-profit company). A CEO is just the head decision maker in an organization.
At the end of the day, SO has server hosting costs, and they have to cover those costs somehow. That makes them a business.
-
Ah, wonderful capitalism working as intended. Everything comes down to money.
-
-
Stack Overflow is supposed to be the wiki of developers, not a fucking business.
Joel Spolsky and Jeff Atwood founded it, and it was sold to Prosus, a Netherlands-based consumer internet conglomerate, on 2 June 2021 for $1.8 billion.
I guess someone would like some of that money back.
-
-
And now they also have to pay back like 2 billion dollar of investor money... What sense does this make?
-
-
I wish resources like this were a public benefit corporation vs a for profit.
Federated also works.
-
-
I've found that the case for most CEOs in technology which is why I call them techbros. Arguably, they don't even know business all that well either.
-
Of course not. They aren't technologists, they're capitalists. Their primary concern is capital.
-
-
Didn’t even know there was a stack overflow strike.
-
This one actually I don't understand. SO has a robust voting system to turn down bad answers. Also, many questions suffer from no answer. So, from the OP's perspective AI assistance is a positive.
The resistance indeed comes from human moderators and answer-ers. And they are ridiculed by (often novice) OPs on Reddit etc.
-
-
Closing garbage is one of the best features of SO. When I began answering questions on Reddit I was literally answering the same shit every few days. It's insane. People asking the same shit without doing any research prior is creating a ton of pointless work for people who can answer. Reddit, as well as Lemmy have no better ways to resolve this problem. SO does it via strict moderation. I guess if ChatGPT can find you a good answer from the bajillion duplicates without having to waste a SME's time, that's a positive. But yeah, I thank SO's moderators for keeping it clean. I'd lose my mind as an asker and especially answerer if I had to keep doing this over and over again. I also have feelings and sifting through mountains of duplicates or having to answer the same questions over and over again hurts me.
-
Not to mention the fact that even if a similar question were answered, if that thread is from 2012, the answer will, with 99% certainty, be totally irrelevant now.
SO has always been a bastion of power hungry dickbags who get off on acting superior and putting others down. They way it's structured reinforces this. It turned what should have been a great place to help each other into a fucking bloodsport arena.
Also, fuck LLMs.
-
I'm with you. It's amazing how fast ChatGPT has replaced SO for me.
I'm not sure how this will work long term. How will the model get new training data?
But honestly? SO can eat a bag of dicks. It doesn't matter if you're asking a question that's nowhere on the site (or the first 3 pages of Google results). It's going to get closed and ignored.
I think most people moved to Reddit and Discord a while ago, which is also problematic. We need to get these conversations happening on the open Fediverse.
-
-
47 comments
It's almost as if there's an entire class of (inordinately wealthy) people who have no reason to exist in the capacity that they do.
CEO's are so important to the functioning of a product that they don't even have to fucking understand the product itself. Why not give them shitloads of money?
I never pass up an opportunity to link this article: CEOs are hugely expensive. Why not automate them?
This is always relevant