We can't keep giving up historical symbols and flags each time some assholes decide to adopt them. The pine tree flag is objectively cool and a part of Americans' shared history. It should not be allowed to become an exclusively right-wing nationalist symbol.
Just a single flag with no mitigating signage and I assume it is a Christofascist. It's not as strong of a signal as Blue Line, Swastika, or Repub campaign yard sign but you'll be right more than half the time. Two US flags is like 99% certainty.
Unfortunately, there's no stopping them. Appropriation is part and parcel with them since they make up for their overabundance of vitriol with a tendency towards a complete lack of productive creativity.
Another example is the Gadsden Flag. It was originally an anti-colonial flag designed during the Revolutionary war, but nowadays it's mostly a libertarian "don't stop me from stepping on others" flag. Here's some parody versions, though:
Jan. 6 is a quantum superposition of antifas feds, tour group, and true patriots. Each conversation with a Repub collapses the waveform into a single state.
A reprehensible as anyone flying that flag is, Mike Johnson is expected to be a deeply biased shithead who aligns with civilian groups. Being objectionable to good reasonable democracy-loving liberals is part of their performance. The Alito story is a very different thing and I don't think it strengthens that case to try to hunt down every instance of people in government flying the flag.
I've seen some (likely incorrect) renditions that depict it head-on like that. It's a pelican feeding its young. The description for the crest is "A pelican Argent, winged Or, in her nest feeding her young, Proper." a clearer picture makes the difference more obvious, but I'm sure you can understand how I got confused.