Proton Pass’s code has been made open source and passed an audit carried out by the security experts at Cure53.
Hey,
Proton Pass is open source and has now passed an independent security audit (by Cure53). The Android and iOS apps source code can be found here, the browser extensions source code for Firefox and Chrome-based browsers (including Edge) can be found here.
Proton has also completed an independent security audit conducted by Cure53 for all Proton Pass applications and browser extensions, along with the Proton API. This was a “white box” audit, meaning the security researchers were given full access to the Proton Pass source code, along with full access to Proton Pass engineers.
More information can be found in the blog post over here. The audit report can also be found in the blog post.
If you use an IMAP email client the ProtonMail Bridge works great on Linux. VPN works well from the command line, though the GUI is still pretty clunky and RAM heavy and either way they really need to make Wireguard and Stealth available on Linux already.
There is zero support for drive under Linux which is the major reason I haven't migrated my workspace org yet. I'd like to ditch Google, but I automate backups with rclone to gdrive and that workflow can't currently be replicated under proton
The official ProtonVPN app on Linux has a lot of problems, like a memory leak that exists since years now. At least for me, only the cli without graphical interface works (but does so very well after some tinkering). The lack of Linux support (especially no Linux app for the drive) has frustrated me to the point I am regularly questioning my Unlimited subscription.
But I agree in general, you can get around a lot of the Linux limitations by using browser extensions like the ProtonVPN one. And overall the addition of new services and great security outweighs the lack of Linux support.
I worry about putting all my eggs (calendar, mail, drive, etc.) in the Proton basket, as much as I like it. I fear a future where they turn evil and I have to de-google my life all over again.
I've been using Bitwarden for a long time and I'm mostly pretty happy with it. I know that, other than the platform's level of security, there's not much to compare when it comes to something like a pass manager, since it only has to do one thing. But does this one have or do something that would make me move to it?
I don't think this is aimed at people who selfhost their own Password Manager. The only real "draw" it would have for those who do is the ability to consolidate your Pass Manager, VPN, and Email into one service.
I've been using Proton pass for about a week and it's okay so far.
Importing passwords from another manager is pretty easy, except that it can only be done from the browser extension. I had to dig out my laptop to import my passwords which was kind of annoying since I rarely use it.
Proton Pass also doesn't work great on mobile, it rarely recongnizes username fields in my browser. This means I have to manually copy/paste my username and password from the app to the browser to login, which is annoying.
I really like that Pass automatically generates a private email address for each website, but I'm not sure how useful that is in terms of privacy because I still have to get things shipped with my real name and address.
Another nitpick I have is using the same password for my email to also secure all of my passwords and generate my TOTP for 2FA. If my Proton password gets compromised then all of my passwords, my 2FA, and my email are compromised. Seems like a pretty serious security risk, but I'd really appreciate it if someone who knows more about security could explain to me why this is actually okay.
Not sure if I qualify for that, but just logically, there's only really a difference if you are not planning on storing your email password in your password manager anyway. If you do that, it doesn't really matter that you have the same password for both, since if your password manager is compromised, your email is just as compromised.
But, and it's a big "but", that's assuming you're using a cloud-based password manager that only requires a single master password to get into. My point of reference here is 1Password, where that's not enough - you also need a device with which you have logged in before, or you need your long, unmemorable Secret Key in addition to your password. You cannot log into 1Password on a new device with just your master password, the way that it appears to be possible with Proton.
Another nitpick I have is using the same password for my email to also secure all of my passwords and generate my TOTP for 2FA. If my Proton password gets compromised then all of my passwords, my 2FA, and my email are compromised. Seems like a pretty serious security risk, but I'd really appreciate it if someone who knows more about security could explain to me why this is actually okay.
Personally I don't use 2fa in my password manager unless it's something I don't care too much about securing because of everything you said. I use bitwarden but they offer the same service. My boss uses it and I can't understand why he would trust one password to secure literally everything. Seems too easy to hack compared to keeping 2fa separate.
I’m using it but it is terribly buggy. Auto fill fails to work majority of time in chromium based browser. It fails to auto save passwords it generated, it suggests passwords generation for login forms and so on.
Despite them saying it’s out of beta, it definitely looks like it’s a beta.
A bit short sighted to not have Proton Pass Family plans; I have 7 other people on my password managers that share vaults; trying to bundle Pass into the Proton Family suite (mail, storage, etc.) is going to miss a decent amount of users who are only looking for a password manager.
I was already paying for both Proton and Bitwarden, I've been trying Proton Pass out since it released and it's nice, seems to do what I need, I might not renew my Bitwarden subscription.