A right to remain silent.
A right to a competent attorney regardless of ability to pay.
A right to due process.
A right to a timely trial by a jury of peers.
A right to healthy food, shelter, healthcare, and other accommodations while incarcerated.
I'm probably missing a few.
That's why the rights of people today shouldn't be dictated by a document written over a century ago. Idolizing a document over human rights is terrible.
Idolizing a document over human rights is terrible.
Well, to be clear, human rights, other than being a vague philosophical concept, are also a document. Much younger, and much more sensible and uncompromising, but still also a document.
Hopefully if new rights are deemed to be needed, they can be added.
I mean, if a document has specific rights written on it and society moves forward and has need for new rights to be added then we should be ready to rewrite and add rights as opposed to treating the document as divine and unchangeable.
I know you're not being serious, but for the sake of the argument, if we're going to force a person, against their will, to be in a certain place for a certain amount of time then we should have to cover all the basic needs that that person may have.
Prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. It’s one of the most fundamental rights that criminals have and it must constantly be revisited to ensure we aren’t brushing aside the cruelty we’re simply accustomed to