You're viewing a single thread.
So are you contending that gay people should be openly supportive of Isreal, a country actively engaged in a genocide?
You see the problem here, right? These aren't black and white, one side good, one side bad situations.
Iran is a terrible country. My partner and I would both be stoned to death there. But there are also queer people living in Iran, in spite of their intolerant regime, many of whom would likely suffer greatly if Isreal manages to force Iran into a war.
Reality is more complicated than just assigning "good guys" and "bad guys". That shit is for Star Wars.
In this specific situation, there is no justification for what Isreal has done. Their attacks on Iran have been unprovoked, and in clear violation of international law. These must recent attacks, by Israel's own admission, include non-military targets which makes them war crimes. Iran on the other hand has responded carefully and proportionally. Does it feel weird to be giving props to such a horrific regime for their behaviour? Absolutely. But it's impossible not to recognize that in this specific situation they are being the adult in the room.
Isreal is actively trying to provoke a war with Iran precisely because they believe it will turn international opinion in their favour, distract from the holocaust they are enacting in Gaza and shore up domestic support for their government. I'm not a fan of anyone involved in this situation, but I sure as hell am not going to express support for the country trying to start a war to distract from their genocide.
So are you contending that gay people should be openly supportive of Isreal, a country actively engaged in a genocide?
No, as evidenced when I said "Me when people are cheering on Iran, a country that literally executes gay people" instead of "Gay people should be openly supportive of Israel". As you did not read what I wrote, I did not read your further paragraphs about something I did not say.
If you can't understand why your post comes across as potentially saying people should support Israel then you probably shouldn't be speaking out on issues like this.
When you say to someone, "Oh, you support [thing]???" In a negative way, and that thing is something that is diametrically opposed to another thing, it is almost always going to come across as implying support for the diametrically opposed thing. Your reply then comes off as a very bad faith response at best, if not a full stumble into narcissism.
I think this says more about your limited perspective than ops, truthfully.
Exactly how is my perspective limited when I am literally empathizing with the perspective of someone else?
Reality is more complicated than just assigning "good guys" and "bad guys".
You wrote that, which you ironically follow with your straw man of OP
Lmao are you actually on tranquilizers or something? I literally, objectively, and demonstratively did not write that. You utter fool, you buffoon, you silly silly person, I am not the writer of the comment at the top of this chain. You are actually arguing with the wrong person.
It's possible to not support both sides of a conflict, and wish that nobody supports or cheers on either side. Peace is when Iran and Isreal don't fight at all, not when Isreal is retaliated against for something terrible they did.
It sounds like you're projecting a lot.
They clearly stated twice that they are a gay person that does not support Israel. Learn to read instead of just seeing what you want to see to justify your anger.
That explanation came after the fact. The original comment is a reply to the original post, which does not include any of that context. You need to learn how the progression of time works before you try to talk down to me about reading comprehension, because you can't even comprehend what order things arrived in.
it's not OP's problem that you aren't literate enough to process things outside of a false binary.
Pity. Reading the further paragraphs would have made you realize that I wasn't actually saying the the thing you assumed I was saying. But taking the path of least consideration seems to be your thing, so I can't say I'm surprised.
Very well said and 100% accurate.
except OP didn't say anything like that, and the entire comment is this user pointlessly beating a strawman just to stir shit and provoke infighting. don't be a yes-man for that shit.
there is absolutely nothing in the post that's pro-Israel. it's purely to remind people that two different things can both be bad.
both states, Israel and Iran, love doing crimes against humanity, and neither should be celebrated.
Basically, it’s like watching two of the worst people you know go at it in a fight.
Iran has problems, for sure, however it's hardly the worst state in the region. In fact, on multiple occasions they've been willing to work with the UN and US to try and rejoin the international community.
The issue is both Israel and the US have acted like utter asses towards them.
Obama's nuclear deal showed just how willing they were to engage in diplomacy. Even after Trump killed the deal, Iran was saying they'd be willing to renter again.
And frankly, the reason for Israel's attack was almost surely because the Trump admin was again getting close to signing another nuclear deal.
There's way too much conflating of Islamic nations and their policies. Iran isn't perfect or great, but it is better than a fair number of the regions governments including many current allies.
Honestly when I read this it’s just like “you think Iran is bad but really the whole area is a cesspool” not that I personally disagree with that take but not sure you meant to throw the entire region under the bus, where it belongs
That would be the US fighting Israel
Yeah like, can they both lose please?
"Can the British Empire and Nazi Germany both lose please"
Where did he say that he supports Israel?
"I don't care for chocolate ice cream."
"OH YEAH WELL WHY DO YOU LOVE VANILLA SO MUCH? YOU KNOW BOTH OF THEM ARE BAD BECAUSE SUGAR RIGHT?"
bro it's hard to take you seriously about "nothing is black and white" when you began your screed by asserting a false dichotomy and assigning OP a position on it that did not express, implicitly or explicitly. that's a thing fascists do. it's not only dishonest and disingenuous, you're flipping an ally into an enemy and turning solidarity and awareness of queer rights issues into infighting to the detriment of our entire movement. be better than that.
You nailed it