You're viewing a single thread.
In all seriousness, this is what happens when you write novels without doing any world-building and just put down whatever seems "fun". The are sooooo many things in that series that make no sense once they are superceded by later plot devices. Rowling didn't think any of it through ahead of time and gave almost no thought to internal consistency with previous content when she wrote new things.
It's honestly a terrible series in most regards and it's kind of disappointing how popular it became.
Also she a trans-hating bigot. Fuck J.K. Rowling. Can't forget that part whenever discussing her or her work.
Rule of cool supersedes making sense. Yeah thereâs a ton of nonsense, but you called it yourself, itâs fun. Thatâs all that matters.
The issue I have with this line of reasoning is that there are equally whimsical, better written series that just didn't have good fortune to pop off the way HP did.
It's marketing. And cover art. And simple timing of fads. It sucks. And it funded a horrible person through pure happenstance
there are equally whimsical, better written series
Which ones can you recommend? I mean, my reading list is already too long but...
If weâre talking âyoung adultâ (which I think is a silly book classification group), the Enchanted Forest Chronicles by Patricia C. Wrede always gets my top pickâshorter, sassy, fun, with well-written female protagonists. (All her books are pretty good, really.)
Another of my top choices in the Fantasy YA category are the Tiffany Aching books by Sir Terry Pratchett. Great fun and Sir Terryâs wonderful brand of biting wisdom.
If you like the âkids go to boarding school, have magical adventures, save the worldâ formula, Mercedes Lackey did a pretty good series called the Shadow Grail. Although the kids are older (and more sensible) than the Harry Potter protagonists.
The Castle Books by John DeChancie are another fun romp of a series. Younger me loved the idea of a castle filled with 144,000 portals to adventure. Although the technology in it is a bit datedâat this point in time, rather humorously so.
Gail Carrigerâs book series are all a good read; my favorite sheâs done so far is the Finishing Series. Not as much magic as other books on this list, but still a well-thought-out system. Her books are really more steampunk-fantasy with a sprinkling of magic on top.
China Mievelle doesnât really write series, per se, but all his books are fun and well-written, with interesting twists and ideas. Iâd say they are the very definition of whimsical.
If your requirements are âgood books by authors as awful as JK Rowlingâ, well, thatâs tougher, but fortunately David and Leigh Eddings decided to throw their hats in the ring! Horrible child abusers, but their writings are genuinely good, way better than what Rowling writes.
Discworld
Not books, but the Misfits and Magic TTRPG show from Dimension 20 is everything that HP isn't. It's fun and whimsical and the characters are lovable and the writing is great and the world building is astounding and it never misses a chance to take the piss at the many problematic aspects of HP it's satirically lampooning. I think the first episode is free on YouTube.
There are some great recommendations in other replies already!
IMO the best YA content right now is actually coming out of Japan (where they're called Light Novels)
Some series worth checking out:
- Re:Zero - Starting Life in Another World from Zero
- Spice & Wolf
- Ascendance of a Bookworm
- World End - What Will You Do at the End of the World? Are You Busy? Will You Save Us?
- Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon?
Don't let the titles fool you (especially that last one). A silly title will often lead to a deep and complex story only loosely related to the title.
The first three I named are some of my absolute favorites.
And this is just the fantasy stuff. If you're looking for sci-fi or rom-com, or something a bit heavier/darker, there are plenty more recommendations I can provide :)
IMO there isn't a whole lot in the kids/young adult space but The Magicians by Lev Grossman is good (and one of the few cases where the TV show is better than the book)
Fun and atmospheric. Kids love it and that's ok.
More than fun. It's whimsical.
She's a terrible person. I read the books to my kids but they are puarated so she doesn't get a penny. Same for the movies.
What happens when your kids want to buy merchandise from a store? When they get older and decide to spend their own money on DVDs? What about the racism and misogyny these books teach to children?
When they are old enough to make their own decisions they can. I'm able to seperate the art from the artist, without introducing them to hateful commentary that they aren't able to properly process yet.
Not showing them Harry Potter does not mean they won't be exposed to the media or the merchandise through friends and shops.
It would take a saint's patience to stop the book at every racist moment and explain why it's wrong.
I'm also able to separate the art from the artist, which is why my house is filled with original Hitlers. I find his perspective interesting.
Hitler, again, was an even more awful person. That doesn't make the autobahns that his government started a bad idea. However, we as a world society decided that the data from the nazi experimentation on twins, on people with disabilities and others would be destroyed.
Hitler was an artist, but not a great one from my understanding. It's trivia, rather than who he was. He was a monster that killed millions. It's very different.
JK is an author. It's what she's known for. Her work has not changed based on her views which were not known then. In fact, I think some fans were upset when she retconned some characters to be more woke, prior to becoming transphobia personified.
Her work may not have "changed", but many elements in retrospect have obvious bigoted undertones, whether she intended them or not. We simply weren't looking for them as children, and didn't notice or understand.
If you're interested in what some of these things are, Youtuber Shaun has an excellent video going over some of them.
Also, the Hitler point was merely a reductio ad absurdum to demonstrate that "separating the art from the artist" is pure luxury.
Neil Gaiman is an alleged rapist. Does that mean the sexual scenes in his books are not valid?
Horrible people is part of the human condition. Erasing them means we don't learn from it.
We can now better recognise the problematic parts of her work to gently help kids to appreciate it. Kids won't get the metaphors with slavery, racism, sexism that all exist with the potterverse. However, showing them these problems even in a fantastical world can help them better understand them in the real world.
Her work doesn't become pointless just by virtue of her being horrible. For some artists, that can even be the point. Look at Joss Whedon, who was lauded for writing powerful female characters. It's now clear he was abusive to the young women in his vicinity. Does that make Buffy less of a heroine or more?
This doesn't really relate to what I said whatsoever, because I never said her books or pointless or that we should erase her. I also didn't even say you're not allowed to read to books to your kid. Just that its content isnt great, and perhaps there are much better books for kids to read, such as the ones she lifted from, like the Earthsea Cycle.
Yeah, I enjoyed the movies I saw as a kid, but it's so painfully mediocre watching it now. And that is before factoring in the garbage human who wrote the books.
All true, though i still found it fun to read when the books came out. At that age my critical thinking skills were not as developed yet, and since that age group is the intended target audience the popularity is not that surprising.
Yes, I liked it too but I'm not under the false impression that's it's a genius work. It's a kids book that kids like and many adults enjoy too.
She's a hateful awful person. Many people are.
I mean, I totally get it. There is just better stuff out there and it sucks that she got lucky when otherr, better authors don't
Yeah. There's a fan-fic I read recently (also the only HP fan fic I've read) called "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality," which is set in an alternate universe in which Harry is raised by perfectly pleasant folks with an understanding of the scientific method, and arrives in the wizarding world and immediately starts deconstructing all the bizarre nonsense going on there. It's very well done, but it's really hard to recommend precisely because it does refer back to a ton of the stuff that's developed in the books, so I had to keep looking up stuff I didn't recall, and I don't really want to devote brain space to that stuff. (Some of the "rationality" stuff has aged a little bit poorly through the replication crisis, too, though I'm a bit more forgiving of that since it talks so much about updating your beliefs.)
But for anyone who did read the books back when and was frustrated at times by the characters behaving so irrationally, it's kinda cathartic in that way. For those who are interested: https://github.com/rrthomas/hpmor
By an author who is also crazy and problematic, though in a very different way than Rowling.
Oh, I didn't know about that, but it isn't hugely surprising.
I guess I should have mentioned this, but there's a lot of stuff in the book that kinda seems like coded libertarian stuff, and it even flirts with pro-authoritarian stuff. It's not a book I would recommend to kids or deeply uncritical people. That's part of why this thread seemed like a safer place to mention it.
True, but at least his version of the universe tries to be coherent.
Way back, years ago, and if memory serves...
There was short story about Harry Potter in a Disney Adventures magazine one month and I think that was supposed to be all there was as far as the story. The popularity of it may have had JKR rushing to build a more in depth story and throwing anything in it that seemed whimsical and fun to a kid, regardless if it made sense.
This is what I tend to say to people about Harry Potter as a series. It was the first series like it to become popular, and that's its only merit. Overall it's very tame and bland, but it got lucky and became popular. I didn't like it because it was too same-y. After book 3 or so, I don't care about Harry Potter anymore. Explore someone else that's more ordinary. It makes a much better setting for derivative works, which to me as someone who writes textbooks of lore for RPGs is more important than just making a series sell well.