The Walrus: Poilievre’s stand against securing his top-level security clearance has emerged as one of the more baffling moments of this early election season. What’s driving his irrational response?
The Walrus: Poilievre’s stand against securing his top-level security clearance has emerged as one of the more baffling moments of this early election season. What’s driving his irrational response?
Pierre Poilievre’s defiant stand against securing his top-level security clearance has emerged as one of the more baffling moments of this early election season. What’s driving his seemingly irrational response to a standard procedure? https://thewalrus.ca/poilievres-refusal-to-get-security-clearanc...
The Walrus on Bluesky
Pierre Poilievre’s defiant stand against securing his top-level security clearance has emerged as one of the more baffling moments of this early election season. What’s driving his seemingly irrational response to a standard procedure? thewalrus.ca/poilievres-refus...
You're viewing a single thread.
This alone should be disqualifying in an election where the central issue facing the country is preservation of sovereignty and when we know foreign interference is a substantial concern. It's made even worse when considering that it's the movement supported by a segment of his base that is threatening Canadian sovereignty, and when we know that a segment of his base are would-be willing defectors.