Ruth First - New General Megathread for the 17th of August 2023
Heloise Ruth First (4 May 1925 – 17 August 1982) was a South African anti-apartheid activist and scholar. She was assassinated in Mozambique, where she was working in exile, by a parcel bomb built by South African police.
Journalist, academic and political activist, Ruth Heloise First was born on 4 May 1925. She was the daughter of Jewish immigrants Julius and Matilda (neé Levetan) First. Julius, a furniture manufacturer, was born in Latvia and came to South Africa in 1906 at the age of 10. Matilda came to South Africa from Lithuania when she was four years old. They were founder members of the Communist Party of South Africa (CPSA, later South African Communist Party [SACP]) in 1921. Ruth and her brother Ronald grew up in a household, in which intense political debate between people of all races and classes often took place.
After matriculating from Jeppe High School for Girls, First studied at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, from 1942 to 1946. She graduated with a BA (Social Studies), receiving firsts in sociology, anthropology, economic history and native administration. Her fellow students included Nelson Mandela, Eduardo Mondlane (Mozambican freedom fighter and the first leader of FRELIMO), Joe Slovo, JN Singh (executive member of both the Natal and South African Indian Congress), and Ismail Meer (a former secretary-general of the South African Indian Congress). First helped found the Federation of Progressive Students and served as secretary to the Young Communist League, and was active in the Progressive Youth Council and, for a short while, the Johannesburg branch of the CPSA.
In 1947 First worked, briefly, for the Johannesburg City Council, but left because she disagreed with the actions of the council. She then became the Johannesburg editor of a left-wing weekly newspaper. As a journalist she specialised in investigative reporting and her incisive articles about slave-like conditions on Bethal potato farms, the women's anti-pass campaign, migrant labour, bus boycotts and slum conditions remain among the finest pieces of social and labour journalism of the 1950s.
Having grown up in a politically conscious home, First's political involvement never abated. Apart from the activities already mentioned, she did support work for the 1946 mineworkers' strike, the Indian Passive Resistance campaign and protests surrounding the outlawing of communism in 1950. First was a Marxist with a wide internationalist perspective. She travelled to China, the Union Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) and countries in Africa, experiences that she documented and analysed. She was central to debates within the Johannesburg Discussion Club, which led to the formation of the underground SACP (of which First was a member) and to closer links between the SACP and the African National Congress (ANC).
In 1949, First married Joe Slovo, a lawyer and labour organiser and, like her, a communist. Throughout the 1950s their home in Roosevelt Park was an important centre for multiracial political gatherings.
Despite her public profile and wide contacts, First remained a private person. She had a brilliant intellect and did not suffer fools gladly. Her sharp criticism and her impatience with bluster earned her enemies and she was often feared in political debate.
In 1953, First helped found the South African Congress of Democrats (COD), the White wing of the Congress Alliance, and she took over as editor of Fighting Talk, a journal supporting the alliance. In 1956, both First and Slovo were arrested and charged in the Treason Trial. The trial lasted four years, after which, all 156 accused were acquitted on 29 March 1961.
First considered herself to be primarily a labour reporter, and during the 1950s she was producing up to 15 stories a week. Despite this high work rate, her writing remained vivid, accurate and often controversial. Her investigative journalism was the basis of her longer pamphlets and, later, her books. The transition to more complex writing came easily.
During the state of emergency following the Sharpeville shootings of March 1960, First fled to Swaziland with her children, returning after the emergency was lifted, six months later, to continue as Johannesburg editor of New Age (successor to The Guardian).
On 9 August 1963, First was detained at the Wits University library. This took place following the arrests of members of the underground ANC, the SACP and Umkhonto we Sizwe in Rivonia on 11 July. In the trial which followed, political leaders such as Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu and Govan Mbeki were sentenced to life imprisonment. However, First was not among the accused.
After 90 days First was released but immediately re-arrested on the pavement outside the police station. She was held for a further 27 days, during which she attempted suicide. During this time her father fled South Africa. Soon after her release First left with her children to join her husband, Joe Slovo, who had already fled the country to Britain.
The family settled in North London and First threw herself into anti-apartheid politics, joining the Anti-Apartheid Movement, holding talks, seminars and public discussions in support of the ANC and SACP.
During the 1960s, First researched and edited Mandela's No Easy Walk to Freedom (1967), Govan Mbeki's The Peasant's Revolt (1967) and Oginda Odinga's Not yet Uhuru (for which she was deported to Kenya).
Following a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) conference at the centre on 17 August 1982, First was killed by a letter bomb, widely believed to have been the work of security agencies within South Africa. Until her death, she remained a ‘listed’ communist and could not be quoted in South Africa.
Ran in to actual non-Laruchite non-Patsoc socialists who insisted that you're only a member of the working class if you are currently receiving a paycheck as an industrial or service worker. Apparently they really do exist, and all the other kinds of workers plus the entire reserve army of labor and anyone whose source of income they think is icky is not working class and should be written off.
Didn't know that still existed, but one of them is a TERF so I'm not surprised they ahve a lot of other bizarre shitty ideas.
Like come on, man, the 20th century conclusively demonstrated that ag workers and peasants are important in any kind of revolutionary leftist operation, Something Marx mostly did not anticipate, and you're still working on a definition of working class that was reductive even before 1918? Jfc.
I'll never forget when some weirdo on the old sub claimed my interests were different than that of the working class because I'm a disabled person who lives off benefits.
It's such a bizarre thing to say. Many if not most disabled people work when they're able to, and even if they don't, what is the argument? They can't contribute to the struggle because they don't have a paystub? OP is just so ablest they don't think there's anything useful disabled people can do if they can't maintain wage labor? idk, it was such a bizarre thing to see from non-Patsocs.
I've talked to so many disabled people who weren't sure what they could do to help out with protest and struggle and I'd always try to come up with suggestions that didn't rely on being able to survive being tackled by a cop or walking or even getting out of bed. People can watch kids, they can make sandwiches, the can work the phones to help with ride shares or bail or whatever. Even if they can't do anything right now because they're bedridden with chronic pain or chronic fatigue or something their situation might change in the future. And even if they're never able to participate directly they're still us. Like does a comrade stop being a comrade because they get injured doing factory work or ag work and can no longer attend meetings? Does getting shot by a cop and losing your ability to walk mean you're no longer working class? It's just such a bizarre, exclusionary thing to say. Like someone coming out of the days of Ugly Laws and trying to defend the practices of the past. "oh, you're disabled? Well you have no value as a human being, then." I didn't think there were still people on the left who thought like that. "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need" is one of the core maxims of left politics. It's literally spelled out.
I kind of understand that viewpoint, I've had shitty and dangerous jobs for a while and I hated the idea of some teleworking comp sci reddit leftie trying to speak on my behalf and being the face of my suffering. I feel like that position comes from being miserable but also ignorance.
I don't feel that way anymore but I still am distrustful of anyone who didnt grow up poor.
I don't feel that way anymore but I still am distrustful of anyone who didnt grow up poor.
Uncritical support. Hammering it in to people who are relatively financially stable that they have shared class interests with people who aren't, and then teaching them manners so they don't alienate people with ignorance and arrogance takes a lot of hammering, and in a better world they'd hammer it in to their own skulls. And then a bunch of them end up doing cop shit without even thinking about it.
I've heard a lot of black and Latine and indigenous people say similar things about dealing with especially white people; Half the time it's just more trouble than it's worth trying to get them in line.
I kinda feel like the well-off working class is just gonna be "along for the ride" unless they are through and through class traitors doing the work themselves (or grew up poor or something). One can expect, especially in the "first world" that they will align themselves with bourgeois interests as long as they are "winning".