Detroit judge who put teen in handcuffs during field trip is demoted to speeding tickets
Detroit judge who put teen in handcuffs during field trip is demoted to speeding tickets
A Detroit judge who was temporarily removed after ordering a teenager into jail clothes and handcuffs during a field trip is back on the bench.
A Detroit judge who was temporarily removed after ordering a teenager into jail clothes and handcuffs during a field trip is back on the bench but assigned to speeding tickets and other relatively minor offenses.
Judge Kenneth King lost courtroom duties in August and was ordered into social-emotional training by the chief judge at 36th District Court. Instead of handling key hearings in major felonies, he returned this week to the court’s traffic division.
“We appreciate his efforts in preparing for this role, and wish him success as he transitions into this new responsibility,” Judge William McConico said in a written statement.
You're viewing a single thread.
I hope he is personally sued for emotional distress amongst other things. Big egos need to be shown the door.
66 0 ReplyThe girl’s mother, Latoreya Till, said she may have been tired because they don’t have a permanent address. King told TV stations that he apologized.
Till has filed a lawsuit, seeking more than $75,000 for “inflicting fear and severe emotional distress.”
Seems to be the case according to the article.
21 0 ReplyWe really don’t want to live in a world where judges have to fear making decisions.
This is bad. That would be much worse.
Edit ITT: People who desperately need to pick up a history book
4 0 ReplyWe absolutely do want to live in a world where judges have to fear making decisions like putting innocent teenagers into jail clothes and handcuffs.
54 0 ReplyHow dare people be held accountable?
25 0 ReplyRight. And maybe if judges were held accountable in this country more often, they wouldn't constantly be doing shit like this.
9 0 Reply
I think decisions they take outside their role as a judge can be punished just fine.
46 0 ReplyHe didn't make that decision as a judge performing his duties, he made it as an egotistical dickhead being an egotistical dickhead
17 0 ReplyQualifies immunity only exists for certain things. More than most would think. So if he's personally liable, I'm in favor of it.
Cops, judges, and other government officials need to... I dunno, be familiar with the Constitution they likely swore to support.
15 0 ReplyNo one is above accountability.
12 0 ReplyIt’s not like this was a case that was brought before him. He didn’t have to decide anything.
Just like you didn’t have to decide to be a condescending prick when people started disagreeing with you.
8 0 ReplyEdit ITT: People who desperately need to pick up a history book
You're the one arguing that people in positions of power shouldn't be held accountable if they abuse their power.
6 0 ReplyTypical liberal “rules for me but not for thee” BS. And to top it off, you add the cute little sneer at the end as an edit.
Christ you people are predictable.
3 0 ReplyChrist you people are predictable.
A .ml accusing anyone they disagree with of being a liberal and blaming others of being predictable. Classic.
10 0 ReplyLiberal? Really?
7 0 Reply