You're viewing a single thread.
Britain and Ireland.
The British isles consists of both Ireland and the United Kingdom.
It's kind of a shitty name to insist upon given our history with Ireland though, isn't it? Like, regardless of what it was called, we can call the archipelago "the British and Irish Isles" or something if we want to.
Personally I reckon we should call it Maughold's Isles. "British and Irish Isles" is fine, if a little wordy. "Islands of the North Atlantic" is one I see floated every so often, but it's miserably generic and even longer. So I suggest we use the patron saint of the Isle of Man. It's in between Britain and Ireland and technically not part of the UK. Maughold himself was a pirate who tried to play a practical joke on St Patrick, so he's a bit of a scoundrel, and it's exactly the kind of silly trivia that we like so much here
As a Manxman I approve 👍 I'm actually surprised how much of the Island is still there.
It sure doesn't.
It does, especially given the name predates the country by 2-3 thousand years; it's not exactly optimal but in reality "These Islands" is the only alternative and something is needed to refer to them from outside the islands.
As an Irish person, geographically, it does. Politically it does not. Given this is a geographical map, rather than political, it's appropriate.
I wouldn't want to see the typical map if great Britain and Northern Ireland with ROI missing. I zoomed in to see my town, which luckily is above water.
Geographically, it's latitude and longitude. Naming is political, not geography.
Geography also describes features, like islands. These islands are named the British isles.
Youre talking about coordinates for location, not geography.
Naming can be political, but is not inherently so.
Naming is ownership, unless it is describing geography like islands.
Updated