The Australian Securities Exchange CHESS blockchain: seven years of sunk cost fallacy
The Australian Securities Exchange CHESS blockchain: seven years of sunk cost fallacy
Enterprise blockchain never made any sense.
![The Australian Securities Exchange CHESS blockchain: seven years of sunk cost fallacy](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/ac28ded9-b0ad-40e5-9beb-5f426151d724.png?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
You're viewing a single thread.
By this point, I think it's pretty obvious that blockchain doesn't have any good use cases beyond financial speculation and scams/fraud.
15 0 ReplyYOU WOULD THINK THAT, BUT
14 0 Replysanctions evasion and money laundering, and that's basically it
10 0 ReplyIt has one legitimate use case that I can think of. Immutable audit logs, even then there are better options.
4 0 Replyso in practice it actually doesn't, and enterprise "blockchain" systems tend to evolve:
- do the real work in the blockchain bit
- do the real work in a program with an SQL database attached, claim the blockchain is for audit logs
- every SQL DB can produce those anyway, remove the blockchain bit entirely
- don't bother removing the word "blockchain" from your marketing copy
multiple such cases!
8 0 Replyexactly, like I said, there is only 1 thing it could be used for, but there are better options for that anyway.
2 0 Reply
Blockchain, the solution in search of a problem.
8 0 ReplyCareful not to conflate things like hash trees with Blockchains. The former do get used for stuff like certificate transparency logs right now, because it is a sensible technology. Blockchains could do exactly the same thing (because they’re based on the same underlying principle), only with much more expense and waste, so there’s basically no point.
7 0 Reply