You're viewing a single thread.
I have to say it. That's a really nice rock.
Well rounded
Uniform oval shape
Well distributed grain
Minimal color invariance
Pauli's exclusion principle compliant
Higher than average support threshold
Aerodynamic
Hydrodynamic
No moss (that's always a plus)
No visible cracks, dents or imperfections
Negative wobblyness
3 dimensional
Positive spinniness
Nice all around silicate spectrum
Higher than average (if not more) cold-handling potential
High end projectile index (above 0.95, that's factoring window breaking potential)
Maximally grind factor (>0.82, that's garlic grade)
Nutcracker performance with tolerable parameters
Accurate weather predictor (Fast drying is most)
Gravitationally bound to Earth system
Free range Baryonic matter contents
All around a solid, great pick. Only needs a banana for scale but thanks to the +-wow factor(i number values) any size variation would just only make it better
Rate: 5/7
7/7 with rice
Bro Rating: 🧢 🧢 🧢 🧢 🧢
Judgement: 👍
It’s a perfect 5 out of 7
you're right. no arguments here
I hate that rock. I dont even think its not man made. Fake ass dumb rock
Why is moss bad?!
It's not bad but has been deprecated as a good predictor since the 1987 US Solar system survey review from the 87-608 reports from Brown, Janet L., where the Framework for sedimentary moss patterns of the Rock Formations on Sol III was developed and standardized