Those 4kb only held a fraction of the computation needed to fly to the moon though. All the complicated heavy stuff was done by humans and bigger computers down on earth.
I used to play extreme music some 15 years ago and by God 80% of our humour was variations of calling each other f*gs. It's quite sad cause we didn't have an ounce of préjudice in us we were just wankers with dead end jobs and shit guitars. We met up with the boys a couple months ago and reminisced there was a lot of cringing...
My meagre understanding : we estimate the age of the universe by factoring some observables like the light and radiation we get from the universe's past, with constants like the speed of light. This new research proposes a model where one of those constants evolves over time, which would significantly alter the final result. It is called the coupling constant but I don't know enough to explain more 😬
No seriously I always install Ubuntu on work machines and they got more breakage in the past couple of years than my arch machine.
I like the kind of revival of nice TUIs that is going on right now. I just wish it continues !
Yeah great joke OP i love how it is exactly like 100% of boomer jokes 👍
I'm still in a dozen anarchy Minecraft discords. I'm inactive and haven't played consistently for a couple years but I like the occasional ping.
I'm a theoretical physicist and I can predict most dropped objects will fall to the floor
"here's how to tell which one" so this guy has solved VC investment. Got it.
You know the company and the users are completely divorced when you read something like that. Redditors have spent years telling each other that awards are useless and a waste of money - then the admins touch it and everybody flips their lid. I for one am glad I'm no longer part of that toxic relationship.
"Damn, I thought mental illness was in the knees"
Yes! This guy shines in uncertain times, that's kind of his brand.
What's disheartening to me in this kind of conversation is that when you boil it down to specifics it becomes super vague. "Cross pollenating data", well i'm a data engineer and i have no idea what that means. "Selling manipulation" is a threat model ? "Embrace Extend Extinguish" ? I'm sorry but that's word salad to me. If we take those arguments far enough they just become "yeah well bad people can do bad things to you on the internet" and while true, this is entirely irrelevant to the fediverse conversation.
The OP blog article does not support the positions you see every day in Lemmy comments such as yours. All he's saying of tangible value is that if Meta federates then your account & instance names will be potentially visible by people on Threads. That is not a credible threat to your privacy in the fediverse - that is just the system of federated social networks working as intended.
Whatever attack vector there is against you already existed before the fediverse or Threads. And Lemmy was never designed or marketed as adequate protection for people who need full-stack privacy.
It's just that there's always something. Always someone inventing problems or trying to skirt any minor inconvenience, real or perceived, by sheer laziness.
Yesterday it was masks and today it's the fucking toilet, tomorrow what will it be? Handicapped ramps? I don't think you hate trans people but you're in that tiny minority of joyless ghouls that would rather piss off everybody than move a muscle to accommodate a need they don't have.
It's shit attitude and when I read this kind of take I just think "how do these poor people even function at work if they can't align on a simple thing like that".
No no let's be clear about the threat model we are discussing here : the possibility for Meta to de-anonymize me in a way that might hurt me, although i don't have accounts on Meta properties. That is a pipe dream. Even the example on the top of the article has nothing to do with federation it's just about a Meta property communicating your data to another Meta property which, no shit, Sherlock.
There is no technical proof that our identities on the fediverse are in danger because of Threads. Litterally zero. There is barely any functioning threat model, and the authors of this one admit readily, in the abstract of the paper, that these models would apply to any bad actor. They just take Threads as a notorious example.
Now, is Lemmy particularly subject to paranoid thinking, or are some trolls shilling on Lemmy to decredibilize the solution, i don't know. But this is all wild speculation.
Also digg peaked at maybe 8 million users which is a much more manageable migration.
That's just fear mongering based on extremely contrived examples. It also has nothing to do with federation, it is trivial for any actor, whatever their resources, to access all the information in the fediverse.
Don't be a boomer. Leverage security in public. Have alts and personas. Stay focused instead of falling for corporate astroturfing that tries to decredibilize new initiatives.
I love that because it's such a cautionary tale about bad leadership. He was toxic towards Twitter for years then bought them and doubled down on shitting on them and calling them incompetent... Of course they hate his guts and maliciously comply now.