Yes, but this is also true for women. I feel like pant/skirt companies would make more money just selling pants/skirts with pockets if their competitors weren't, unless all bottom-clothes companies also started selling purses at the same time in some sort of anti-female-pocket cartel.
I'm sure there's some history behind this that I don't fully understand. The logic just seems flawed to me.
Books weren't designed to be addictive and make you lose track of time.
Maybe not all books, but a good book is, to me, quite addictive and causes me to lose track of time.
After reading the article though, I'm realizing I'm not a typical bathroom user. I've always had digestive issues unrelated to books and cell phones, so my loo time is much longer than average, it seems. I must be one of those 7%.
not to defend smart phones, but I used to read books on the toilet before phones became popular and never had a problem. What's different about a phone?
Yeah, and I'm considerably new to the field. Not unskilled but like entry level new, as far as professional tech experience goes. I was trying to change careers from business degree / accountant when I was laid off.
Really trying not to go back to accounting as it was mind numbingly boring.
I'm just gonna keep trying until something gives and have fun learning more in the process.
![y0kai [he/him]](https://anarchist.nexus/static/media/users/5w/zT/5wzTKzFWQVJmUey.jpg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
y0kai [he/him] @ y0kai @anarchist.nexus 帖子 0评论 34加入于 3 wk. ago
Yes, but this is also true for women. I feel like pant/skirt companies would make more money just selling pants/skirts with pockets if their competitors weren't, unless all bottom-clothes companies also started selling purses at the same time in some sort of anti-female-pocket cartel.
I'm sure there's some history behind this that I don't fully understand. The logic just seems flawed to me.