Value Subtracted @ ValueSubtracted @startrek.website

[Mastodon](https://mstdn.ca/@ValueSubtracted)

---

Read more

Posts

2,494

Comments

2,685

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

They rebranded as "Season 1" last year, presumably to provide Disney+ viewers with a good jumping-on point.

The copyright for the Daleks is held by the estate of their creator Terry Nation. They license it to the BBC.

Edit: This article seems to sum it up pretty well.

They're all worth watching, if only so you can make your own decisions.

This would have had implications far beyond the one episode - in this alternate universe, the Time Lords were wiped out by the Toclafane, aka humanity...

The holo-crew is a really smart idea for a solo freighter captain.

Good catch, I'd completely forgotten about that line:

Some of these hulls are organic. Some...some are completely comprised of holographic-containment walls.

wait, does Discovery has a holodeck?

They actually seem to have what you're describing, more or less - Burnham was able to run complete holosimulations in her quarters.

sighs, opens the drawer of crayons

Star Trek's Best Kept Secret

Naveen Andrews is such a perfect choice, I'm mad I never thought of it before.

I think the Picard designs are largely fine...ironically with the exception of the final hero ship, which I do not care for.

One thing to consider is hashtags. Each Lemmy posts automatically gets a hashtag that's identical to the community's @ name (so, this post has #canada). It might be worth poking around the Fediverse to see if there are existing hashtags that might make sense, and to give the communities those names, just to extend visibility beyond Lemmy.

Lawd, I hope this project goes smoothly and scandal-free...

They apparently have an XL Protostar slotted for January 2026.

They started at the beginning of December - not bad for something the PCs didn't want to do so badly that they tried to make it an election issue.

At this time, it would probably be easier to make that charge stick. I don't know if "force" has a concrete legal definition.

I can't help but feel like there's a way to express discontent that doesn't also encourage the weaponization of citizenship to circumvent the legal system.

I would expect them to mail you something, though when I signed up for my local Co-op several years ago, they sent little key chain tags rather than full-sized membership cards.

Showing absolutely no restraint in episode one, I see.

Treason

(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,

(a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;

(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;

( c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);

(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or

(e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.

Basically, the US government would atually have to use force to overthrow the government, and we would have to be able to prove in court that Elon participated in those actions.