Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TH
Posts
9
Comments
7,341
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Both? Both sides? Both sides of the climate crisis? My dudes, nobody gets to go live on the Sun under its protection, not even with all the money. There's one side to the climate crisis, and we're all on it.

    Oh, I see. He's making money pretending to invest in green technologies, and he's making money polluting the environment. That's the "both sides" they meant. Except those two industries are still both on the same side of the equation. It's like we're all on the Titanic, and Gates is spreading towels over deck chairs AND sitting at a table by the bar, like "Oh no! A guy with all the money is being greedy and dishonest. What should we do?"

  • Thing is, Kimmel will be fine. He's already rich, and he doesn't need the job. I'm sure he'll land on his feet.

    But there are likely hundreds or maybe thousands of people who work on the show. Writers, set designers, the fucking craft services people, they are all victims of a fascist crackdown on free speech.

  • It would have to be 2. The blowhole is where the dolphin breathes out, and it has the muscles to adjust airflow for embouchure, but I don't know if it can constrict and vibrate at the right frequencies to produce music.

    A dolphin's mouth doesn't have any lip control, even if it could breathe out. Which I don't think it can.

  • Separate, but related. How can you even define the "golden age" without consensus on what makes a television series great? Seems like every time a cultural phenomenon ends, people want to declare the end of good TV. But I would argue there are more great shows being made right now, and that the low density of attention is actually good for creators to explore and create.

  • The biggest effect of all of this is the decoupling of the release of content with it's entering the public consciousness. As a kid, you watched the show that week at that time so you could talk about it and be in the loop the following day. If you went to school or your office and said "Don't tell me, I haven't seen it yet!" people would treat you like a social leper. In fact, many 90s and 00s sitcoms feature storylines where characters made fools of themselves trying to avoid spoilers.

    Today, many viewers don't even start watching a show until it's fully over and hasn't been cut short on a cliffhanger cancellation. And that's good for viewers, because it gives us the freedom to be picky. But it's bad for in-person social interactions, because I can't talk to you about my favorite show because we aren't in the same temporal condition in relation to it. You just started, and I'm like hoooboy wait until it gets going.

    But that social interaction also helps draw in viewers. "Did you see that show last night? You should be watching it. Get caught up before next Thursday so we can talk about the finale in two weeks!"

    We barely have water coolers anymore, and the kids are more into short-form and livestreaming content. You don't even need to watch, you can just catch up on the latest talking points from twitter.

    Online forums exist, but the anonymous keyboard warrior you're talking with could be some psychotic misogynist who hates puppies, and you have nothing in common. Of course your tastes would be different.

  • Hold up, because this gives me an idea.

    Let's embrace the celebration. Let's lean into honoring the man they claim Charlie Kirk was. Make remembering him all about the tolerance for debate and discussion, the respect for minorities and women, the traditional values of freedom of speech. In honor of Kirk, speak truth to power, and challenge the conventional ideas.

    Nevermind, my mind isn't limber enough for all thos gymnastics.