Same -- I changed jobs since lockdown started, I work for a company now that was 100% remote before all this started. I've actually moved halfway across the country and... yeah, other than now I pay state income tax, nothing has changed for me. I have an office, that's technically a change, I guess.

Another fun comparison is to watch Seven Samurai, then watch The Magnificent Seven.

New York has a similar thing about to take effect, as well.

Someone just made this up so that they could get it away from their kid, didn't they?

I jest, but that would be funny.

For sure! I happened to come across it by accident while watching the first version.

She has a "version 2" as well! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLFbZlYWaKc

Not just this, it's AH. Not... terrible, but super hype-y from what I've seen.

Yeah, I realize that these are extremes of it, but when the faces of the movement are overwhelmingly awful people, it's a problem.

Do you want Reavers? Because this is how you get gorram Reavers.

There's a portion of the EA movement that uses their beliefs to justify whatever it takes to make as much money as possible so they can donate more. SBF was in this camp, for example.

It's modern-day secular indulgences for a lot of people -- it doesn't matter how much harm you've really done, so long as you are effectively helping people.

There is also a lot of issue with how they figure out what's most effective.

Well. Damn. This helped me out, thanks.

This is actually an incredibly good point. This applies to writing, visual arts, music, programming...

The bulk of heavy users are on third party apps, most likely.

I'd be a lot more willing to believe it's down to the engine if we weren't also dealing with a bunch of other games coming out on consoles at 30FPS.

"Taking over" is the wrong tense and the wrong interpretation. With very few exceptions, charter schools have been a Christian nationalist ploy nearly from the beginning.

To some extent, Reddit does get a slice - in the form of user engagement. User engagement is how they generate ad impressions, even if it's not from the users on the third party apps.

They COULD have simply put ads into the API, or made it a requirement. They didn't.

Their entire goal is to maximize "value" before their IPO. Control and number inflation. They don't care about the long term. Spez wants to cash out, and he doesn't care what it costs the company.

If, as Starbucks claims, this is, at most, happening at the store/district levels, they need to own that narrative.

Even worse, their official app uses the same API -- and, by estimates, the Reddit app uses more calls than Apollo does.

They wanted more per user than they will ever make. A multiple of that, in fact.

Knowing what I know about the costs of streaming video, I really want to know what the alternative is for a platform that can't just throw money down the drain. To my mind, there are only two options here - people watch ads (within reason, but 2 hour ads aren't resonable), or people pay YouTube (a la Premium).

If you want things for free, the only way to make that happen sustainably is ads right now. Donations simply will not work, especially for something with the costs that video incurs - to say nothing about being able to compensate creators for their time and effort.

Unfortunately, the way federation works means that a 100 user instance that never grows past that can still see cost increases from the ecosystem growing. The number of network effects involved in all of this makes planning for meaningful sustainability a lot more difficult.