The Georgia process actually required the Dems to go through an appeal, so I’m sure it wasn’t cheap.
She’s on the ballot, or has write-in status in 42 states. Dems only managed to successfully kick her off the ballot in 2 states.
The Democrats don’t spend millions in legal fees to sue “fringe candidates” off of the ballot.
Do y’all ever stop to ask, ‘what could we do to win these people to our side?’ Or do you think the condescension will actually work this time?
Yeah, media refusing to cover a candidate tends to impact their polling. Big surprise.
Then maybe the Dems should’ve ran a candidate who isn’t famous for her low favorability ratings.
If a candidate is so weak you have to rig the primary for them, they aren’t strong enough to compete in a general election. This isn’t rocket science.
The intelligence orgs just aren’t putting their best efforts into these bogus claims lately.
I love how even a biased take, trying to paint Harris much further left than she actually is, still went hard on Harris’ right-wing anti-immigration policies as if they were a good thing. LoL.
You’re getting really unhinged in the comments for people just making sure the democrats are doing the opposite, which is what you’re implying they would do.
I suspect you’re getting upset because you know the Biden admin advanced some of Trump’s worst policies, and you don’t want anyone pointing that out.
It wasn’t meant to convince you. It was meant to show the lurkers you’re full of shit. I’m confident they get the picture.
Blocked.
I’m just saying it seems like a more obtainable ask.
Defending the oil lobby’s anti-nuclear propaganda is really not helping you.
https://environmentalprogress.org/the-war-on-nuclear
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/05/anti-nuclear-lobby-misled-world
https://www.influencewatch.org/movement/opposition-to-nuclear-energy/
https://climatecoalition.org/who-opposes-nuclear-energy/
https://www.axios.com/2017/12/15/big-oils-electric-fight-against-coal-and-nuclear-1513304200
the claim that the oil industry paid anyone to stop nuclear is a right wing lie.
Oil lobby bot confirmed.
Nuclear is not capitalists’ “biggest outfit.” You’re thinking of oil, and they pay astroturfers to convince people like you to be anti-nuclear.
I don’t assume unlimited funds. I know that the only way we can actually address climate change is to overthrow the capitalists driving the pollution. Ending their wars would provide far more than adequate funding, even before wealth redistribution.
I can’t imagine being so uninformed that you believe the advantages of nuclear energy has no scientific basis. On par with the flat earthers.
Why not just a case with a slide out Bluetooth keyboard in the back?
It’s easy to tell who’s been propagandized, because they care more about how much it will cost than actually saving the planet.
I’m not concerned about economic sense. I’m worried about keeping the planet habitable.
They’re still banning or driving away anyone outside of Musk’s echo chamber.
The vast majority of users are not big time contributors to the site’s quality content. But the content creators had the biggest targets on their back for retaliation. After so many bans over such a long period, there’s just less and less people to post quality content for the majority to consume.
Cracking down on narrative control doesn’t force the public to see things your way. It just drives them to other, more relevant platforms. Not sure how many times we need to go through this cycle for them to understand how futile this is.
Cheaper long term, yes. Higher upfront cost.
The backup is nuclear.
I don’t really care what it costs. We’re trying to save the habitability of the planet. Damn the cost.